Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27051515›Full record

ReviewInterface focus2016

The Human Physiome: how standards, software and innovative service infrastructures are providing the building blocks to make it achievable.

David Nickerson, Koray Atalag, Bernard de Bono, Jörg Geiger, Carole Goble, Susanne Hollmann, Joachim Lonien, Wolfgang Müller, Babette Regierer, Natalie J Stanford and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interface focus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Systems Medicine-Complexity Within, Simplicity Without.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David NickersonAuckland Bioengineering Institute , The University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4667-9779
Koray AtalagAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; National Institute for Health Innovation (NIHI), The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0517-4803
Bernard de BonoAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London NW1 2DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-5274
Jörg GeigerInterdisciplinary Bank of Biomaterials and Data , University Hospital Würzburg , Würzburg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7689-531X
Carole GobleSchool of Computer Science , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1219-2137
Susanne HollmannResearch Center Plant Genomics and Systems Biology, Universitat Potsdam , Potsdam , Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9032-2035
Joachim LonienGerman Institute for Standardization , Berlin , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1048-6943
Wolfgang MüllerHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH) , Heidelberg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4980-3512
Babette RegiererLifeGlimmer GmbH , Berlin , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5263-4553
Natalie J StanfordSchool of Computer Science , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-0184
Martin GolebiewskiHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH) , Heidelberg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8683-7084
Peter HunterAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9665-4145

Funding

The Virtual Physiological Rat ProjectP50GM094503 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BEARD, DANIEL A · 2011 to 2015
$11.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM094503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing and understanding the Human Physiome virtually is a complex mathematical problem, and a highly demanding computational challenge. Mathematical models spanning from the molecular level through to whole populations of individuals must be integrated, then personalized. This requires interoperability with multiple disparate and geographically separated data sources, and myriad computational software tools. Extracting and producing knowledge from such sources, even when the databases and software are readily available, is a challenging task. Despite the difficulties, researchers must frequently perform these tasks so that available knowledge can be continually integrated into the common framework required to realize the Human Physiome. Software and infrastructures that support the communities that generate these, together with their underlying standards to format, describe and interlink the corresponding data and computer models, are pivotal to the Human Physiome being realized. They provide the foundations for integrating, exchanging and re-using data and models efficiently, and correctly, while also supporting the dissemination of growing knowledge in these forms. In this paper, we explore the standards, software tooling, repositories and infrastructures that support this work, and detail what makes them vital to realizing the Human Physiome.

Indexed as

Human Physiomemanaging big datarepositoriesreproducible scienceservice infrastructurestandards

Identifiers

PMID27051515
PMCPMC4759754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.