ReviewInterface focus2016
Mathematics in modern immunology.
Review in Interface focus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative lymph node-mimicking models created with biomaterials and computational tools to study the immune system.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Modeling population heterogeneity from microbial communities to immune response in cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- Article
- Distributed Adaptive Search in T Cells: Lessons From Ants.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Synchronous Germinal Center Onset Impacts the Efficiency of Antibody Responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- Introduction to modeling viral infections and immunity.Immunological reviews · 2018Article
- The Role of Infected Cell Proliferation in the Clearance of Acute HBV Infection in Humans.Viruses · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical and statistical methods enable multidisciplinary approaches that catalyse discovery. Together with experimental methods, they identify key hypotheses, define measurable observables and reconcile disparate results. We collect a representative sample of studies in T-cell biology that illustrate the benefits of modelling-experimental collaborations and that have proven valuable or even groundbreaking. We conclude that it is possible to find excellent examples of synergy between mathematical modelling and experiment in immunology, which have brought significant insight that would not be available without these collaborations, but that much remains to be discovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.