Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27051510›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2016

Multiscale musculoskeletal modelling, data-model fusion and electromyography-informed modelling.

J Fernandez, J Zhang, T Heidlauf, M Sartori, T Besier, O Röhrle, D Lloyd

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05795348 (ForceLoss), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05795348 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

ForceLoss: Part II - Osteoarthritic Patients. Development and Validation of Methods to Generate Personalised Models for the Differential Diagnosis of the Loss of Muscle Force

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsPersonalised Musculoskeletal Modeling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J FernandezAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7721-8698
J ZhangAuckland Bioengineering Institute , University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.
T HeidlaufInstitut für Mechanik (Bau) , University of Stuttgart , Stuttgart , Germany.
M SartoriDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Engineering , University Medical Center Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany.
T BesierAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
O RöhrleInstitut für Mechanik (Bau) , University of Stuttgart , Stuttgart , Germany.
D LloydCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes methods and technologies that advance the state of the art for modelling the musculoskeletal system across the spatial and temporal scales; and storing these using efficient ontologies and tools. We present population-based modelling as an efficient method to rapidly generate individual morphology from only a few measurements and to learn from the ever-increasing supply of imaging data available. We present multiscale methods for continuum muscle and bone models; and efficient mechanostatistical methods, both continuum and particle-based, to bridge the scales. Finally, we examine both the importance that muscles play in bone remodelling stimuli and the latest muscle force prediction methods that use electromyography-assisted modelling techniques to compute musculoskeletal forces that best reflect the underlying neuromuscular activity. Our proposal is that, in order to have a clinically relevant virtual physiological human, (i) bone and muscle mechanics must be considered together; (ii) models should be trained on population data to permit rapid generation and use underlying principal modes that describe both muscle patterns and morphology; and (iii) these tools need to be available in an open-source repository so that the scientific community may use, personalize and contribute to the database of models.

Indexed as

model fusionmultiscale modellingmusculoskeletalmusculoskeletal database

Identifiers

PMID27051510
PMCPMC4759749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.