Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27051506›Full record

ReviewInterface focus2016

Requirements for multi-level systems pharmacology models to reach end-usage: the case of type 2 diabetes.

Elin Nyman, Yvonne J W Rozendaal, Gabriel Helmlinger, Bengt Hamrén, Maria C Kjellsson, Peter Strålfors, Natal A W van Riel, Peter Gennemark, Gunnar Cedersund

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interface focus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Type 2 diabetes: one disease, many pathways.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The promises of quantitative systems pharmacology modelling for drug development.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Elin NymanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; CVMD iMed DMPK AstraZeneca R&D, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-0291
Yvonne J W RozendaalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering , Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven , The Netherlands.
Gabriel HelmlingerQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology, AstraZeneca , Pharmaceuticals LP, Waltham, MA , USA.
Bengt HamrénQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology , AstraZeneca , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Maria C KjellssonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Peter StrålforsDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden.
Natal A W van RielDepartment of Biomedical Engineering , Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven , The Netherlands.
Peter GennemarkCVMD iMed DMPK AstraZeneca R&D , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Gunnar CedersundDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEEindhoven Cancer Registry · NLAstraZeneca (Singapore) · SGAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEKala Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are currently in the middle of a major shift in biomedical research: unprecedented and rapidly growing amounts of data may be obtained today, from in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies, at molecular, physiological and clinical levels. To make use of these large-scale, multi-level datasets, corresponding multi-level mathematical models are needed, i.e. models that simultaneously capture multiple layers of the biological, physiological and disease-level organization (also referred to as quantitative systems pharmacology-QSP-models). However, today's multi-level models are not yet embedded in end-usage applications, neither in drug research and development nor in the clinic. Given the expectations and claims made historically, this seemingly slow adoption may seem surprising. Therefore, we herein consider a specific example-type 2 diabetes-and critically review the current status and identify key remaining steps for these models to become mainstream in the future. This overview reveals how, today, we may use models to ask scientific questions concerning, e.g., the cellular origin of insulin resistance, and how this translates to the whole-body level and short-term meal responses. However, before these multi-level models can become truly useful, they need to be linked with the capabilities of other important existing models, in order to make them 'personalized' (e.g. specific to certain patient phenotypes) and capable of describing long-term disease progression. To be useful in drug development, it is also critical that the developed models and their underlying data and assumptions are easily accessible. For clinical end-usage, in addition, model links to decision-support systems combined with the engagement of other disciplines are needed to create user-friendly and cost-efficient software packages.

Indexed as

anti-diabetic treatmentdecision-support type 2 diabetesdisease progressionmathematical modellingsystems pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID27051506
PMCPMC4759745
OpenAlexW2337041132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.