Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27051423›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of microbiology2016

Bacteria in Cancer Therapy: Renaissance of an Old Concept.

Sebastian Felgner, Dino Kocijancic, Michael Frahm, Siegfried Weiss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. EngineeredMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Oncolytic Probiotics with Molecular Pili for Solid Tumor Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian FelgnerDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0030-2490
Dino KocijancicDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Michael FrahmDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Siegfried WeissDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany; Institute of Immunology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising incidence of cancer cases worldwide generates an urgent need of novel treatment options. Applying bacteria may represent a valuable therapeutic variant that is intensively investigated nowadays. Interestingly, the idea to apply bacteria wittingly or unwittingly dates back to ancient times and was revived in the 19th century mainly by the pioneer William Coley. This review summarizes and compares the results of the past 150 years in bacteria mediated tumor therapy from preclinical to clinical studies. Lessons we have learned from the past provide a solid foundation on which to base future efforts. In this regard, several perspectives are discussed by which bacteria in addition to their intrinsic antitumor effect can be used as vector systems that shuttle therapeutic compounds into the tumor. Strategic solutions like these provide a sound and more apt exploitation of bacteria that may overcome limitations of conventional therapies.

Identifiers

PMID27051423
PMCPMC4802035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.