ArticleInterventional neurology2016
Inadvertent Stent Retriever Detachment: A Multicenter Case Series and Review of Device Experience FDA Reports.
Article in Interventional neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating Through Catastrophe: Successful Unsheathed Stent Extraction in Acute Myocardial Infarction.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis vs. mechanical thrombectomy: a literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Inadvertent Detachment of Stent Retrievers: Report of 2 Cases.Neurointervention · 2024Article
- Stroke thrombectomy complication management.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2021Review
- Inadvertent Detachment of Stent Retrievers during Mechanical Thrombectomy-A Clinical and Biomechanical Perspective.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Endovascular Stroke Interventions: Procedural Complications and Management.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020Review
- Accidental guide catheter fracture in mechanical thrombectomy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019Article
- Retrieval of Migrated Volume Coils Using Different Clot Retrievers in a Porcine Model.Clinical neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Direct Aspiration Catheter Fracture and Retrieval during Neurothrombectomy.Interventional neurology · 2018Article
- Solitaire stentectomy: 'deploy and engage' and 'loop and snare' techniques.BMJ case reports · 2016Article
- Retained Solitaire FR device after mechanical thrombectomy: Case review and management strategies.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2016
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical thrombectomy using retrievable stents or stent retriever devices has become the mainstay of intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The recent publication of a series of positive trials supporting intra-arterial therapy as standard of care for the treatment of large vessel occlusion will likely further increase stent retriever use. Rarely, premature stent detachment during thrombectomy may be encountered. In our multicenter case series, we found a rate of detachment of less than 1% (n = 7/1,067), and all were first-generation Solitaire FR devices. A review of the US Food and Drug Administration database of device experience yielded 90 individual adverse reports of detachment. There were 82, 1 and 7 detachments of Solitaire FR (first generation), Solitaire FR2 (second generation) and Trevo devices, respectively. We conclude with a brief overview of the technical and procedural considerations which may be helpful in avoiding this rare complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.