Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27051344›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2016

Production of α1,3-galactosyltransferase targeted pigs using transcription activator-like effector nuclease-mediated genome editing technology.

Jung-Taek Kang, Dae-Kee Kwon, A-Rum Park, Eun-Jin Lee, Yun-Jin Yun, Dal-Young Ji, Kiho Lee, Kwang-Wook Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Histotripsy Ablation in Preclinical Animal Models of Cancer and Spontaneous Tumors in Veterinary Patients: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
    Review
  2. Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Use of gene-editing technology to introduce targeted modifications in pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jung-Taek KangMGENPLUS Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul 08511, Korea.
Dae-Kee KwonMGENPLUS Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul 08511, Korea.
A-Rum ParkMGENPLUS Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul 08511, Korea.
Eun-Jin LeeMGENPLUS Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul 08511, Korea.
Yun-Jin YunMGENPLUS Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul 08511, Korea.
Dal-Young JiMGENPLUS Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul 08511, Korea.
Kiho LeeDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Kwang-Wook ParkMGENPLUS Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul 08511, Korea.; Department of Animal Science & Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KRSunchon National University · KRVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in genome editing technology using meganucleases demonstrate an efficient method of producing gene edited pigs. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of the transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) system in generating specific mutations on the pig genome. Specific TALEN was designed to induce a double-strand break on exon 9 of the porcine α1,3-galactosyltransferase (GGTA1) gene as it is the main cause of hyperacute rejection after xenotransplantation. Human decay-accelerating factor (hDAF) gene, which can produce a complement inhibitor to protect cells from complement attack after xenotransplantation, was also integrated into the genome simultaneously. Plasmids coding for the TALEN pair and hDAF gene were transfected into porcine cells by electroporation to disrupt the porcine GGTA1 gene and express hDAF. The transfected cells were then sorted using a biotin-labeled IB4 lectin attached to magnetic beads to obtain GGTA1 deficient cells. As a result, we established GGTA1 knockout (KO) cell lines with biallelic modification (35.0%) and GGTA1 KO cell lines expressing hDAF (13.0%). When these cells were used for somatic cell nuclear transfer, we successfully obtained live GGTA1 KO pigs expressing hDAF. Our results demonstrate that TALEN-mediated genome editing is efficient and can be successfully used to generate gene edited pigs.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD55 AntigensCell LineDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedExonsGalactosyltransferasesGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesHumansNuclear Transfer TechniquesSwineTranscription Activator-Like Effector NucleasesCD55 AntigensGalactosyltransferasesN-acetyllactosaminide alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferaseTranscription Activator-Like Effector Nucleasesalpha-1,3-galactosyltransferasecloned pighuman decay-accelerating factorknockoutsomatic cell nuclear transfer

Identifiers

PMID27051344
PMCPMC4808648
OpenAlexW2308010778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.