Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27051305›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2016

Progesterone receptor loss identifies hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer subgroups at higher risk of relapse: a retrospective cohort study.

Jia-Yuan Sun, San-Gang Wu, Feng-Yan Li, Huan-Xin Lin, Zhen-Yu He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic role of progesterone receptor expression in a population-based analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Yuan SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
San-Gang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Feng-Yan LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Huan-Xin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Yu HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the prognostic value of progesterone receptor (PR) expression in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer subgroups.

methodsA retrospective review of breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between January 1998 and December 2007 was performed. The prognostic impact of PR status on disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed.

resultsOf the 1,301 patients included in this study, the median follow-up time was 64 months, and the median age was 46 years. There were 18.4% of patients (n=219) with PR negative (PR-) cancer. Women with PR-breast cancer were more likely to be postmenopausal (P<0.001) and have pN3 stage (P=0.031) and Stage III (P=0.049) cancer. Cox regression univariate and multivariate analysis showed that PR status was a significant prognostic factor for DFS. Patients with PR- status had poorer DFS (hazard ratio =1.626, 95% confidence interval =1.060-2.497, P=0.026). The 5-year DFS for patients with PR- and PR+ breast cancer was 79.4% and 86.2%, respectively, and the 8-year DFS for patients with PR- and PR+ breast cancer was 69.6% and 78.1%, respectively (P=0.012). A significant difference in DFS was observed between PR- and PR+ disease in patients with node-negative cancer, but was not for patients with lymph node metastasis (P=0.242). In premenopausal patients, DFS varied significantly by PR status (P=0.049). A marginally significant difference in DFS between the PR- and PR+ disease was seen in postmenopausal patients (log rank P=0.065).

conclusionLack of PR expression is associated with worse survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer subgroups.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast cancer subtypeprogesterone receptorprognosisrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID27051305
PMCPMC4807933
OpenAlexW2310580441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.