ArticleVeterinary world2016
Awareness, knowledge, and risks of zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab.
Article in Veterinary world, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brucellosis awareness and knowledge in communities worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 79 observational studies.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Pooled it
- Improving Public Health Intervention Design for Food-Borne Zoonotic Disease Control: Insights From a Situational Analysis of Meat Consumers' Knowledge and Practices in Burkina Faso.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Digital engagement and knowledge about zoonoses among dog and cat owners in Rio de Janeiro: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Risk Assessment ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Seroprevalence and Associated Factors of Small Ruminant Brucellosis in the Dubti District of the Afar Region, Ethiopia.Veterinary medicine international · 2025Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices to Foodborne Zoonotic Diseases and Their Associated Factors in and Around Debre Tabor City, Northwest Ethiopia.Veterinary medicine international · 2025Article
- One health intervention for the control and elimination of scrub typhus, anthrax, and brucellosis in Southeast Asia: a systematic review.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Review
- Article
- Zoonotic diseases awareness and food safety practices among livestock farmers in Nepal.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Risk Assessment Tools from the One Health Perspective: A Narrative Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Review
- Farmers' Attitudes in Connection with the Potential for Rodent Prevention in Livestock Farming in a Municipality in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Situation Analysis and Recommendations for the Biosecurity Status of Dairy Farms in Punjab, India: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Assessing and Prioritizing Zoonotic Diseases in Punjab, India: A One Health Approach.EcoHealth · 2023Article
- Knowledge and Practices of Cypriot Bovine Farmers towards Effective and Safe Manure Management.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- The knowledge, attitudes, and practices of smallholder cattle farmers concerning the epidemiology of bovine fasciolosis in the North West Province, South Africa.Tropical animal health and production · 2023Article
- Regional variation in knowledge and practice regarding common zoonoses among livestock farmers of selective districts in Nepal.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- Knowledge, perceptions, and practices around zoonotic diseases among actors in the livestock trade in the Lake Victoria crescent ecosystem in East Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- One Health activities to reinforce intersectoral coordination at local levels in India.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Zoonotic diseases risk perception and infection prevention and control practices among poultry farmers in the Buea Health District, Cameroon: A one health perspective.Veterinary world · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe present study was conducted to assess the awareness, knowledge, and risks of zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab. MATERIALS AND
methods250 livestock farmers were selected randomly and interviewed with a pretested questionnaire, which contained both open and close ended questions on different aspects of zoonotic diseases, i.e., awareness, knowledge, risks, etc. Knowledge scorecard was developed, and each correct answer was awarded one mark, and each incorrect answer was given zero mark. Respondents were categorized into low (mean - ½ standard deviation [SD]), moderate (mean ± ½ SD), and high knowledge (Mean + ½ SD) category based on the mean and SD. The information about independent variables viz., age, education, and herd size were collected with the help of structured schedule and scales. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, and results were prepared to assess awareness, knowledge, and risks of zoonotic diseases and its relation with independent variables.
resultsMajority of the respondents had age up to 40 years (70%), had their qualification from primary to higher secondary level (77.6%), and had their herd size up to 10 animals (79.6%). About 51.2% and 54.0% respondents had the history of abortion and retained placenta, respectively, at their farms. The respondents not only disposed off the infected placenta (35.6%), aborted fetus (39.6%), or feces (56.4%) from a diarrheic animal but also gave intrauterine medication (23.2%) bare-handedly. About 3.6-69.6% respondents consumed uncooked or unpasteurized animal products. About 84.8%, 46.0%, 32.8%, 4.61%, and 92.4% of livestock farmers were aware of zoonotic nature of rabies, brucellosis, tuberculosis, anthrax, and bird flu, respectively. The 55.6%, 67.2%, 52.0%, 64.0%, and 51.2% respondents were aware of the transmission of zoonotic diseases to human being through contaminated milk, meat, air, feed, or through contact with infected animals, respectively. The transmission of rabies through dog bite (98.4%), need of post-exposure vaccination (96.8%), and annual vaccination of dogs (78%) were well-known facts but only 47.2% livestock owners were aware of the occurrence of abortion due to brucellosis and availability of prophylactic vaccine (67.6%) against it as a preventive measure. About 69.2% respondents belonged to low to medium knowledge level categories, whereas 30.8% respondents had high knowledge (p<0.05) regarding different aspects of zoonotic diseases. Age, education, and herd size had no significant effect on the knowledge level and awareness of farmers toward zoonotic diseases.
conclusionTherefore, from the present study, it may be concluded that there is a need to create awareness and improve knowledge of livestock farmers toward zoonotic diseases for its effective containment in Punjab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.