Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27050457›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2016

Distinct temporal requirements for autophagy and the proteasome in yeast meiosis.

Fu-ping Wen, Yue-shuai Guo, Yang Hu, Wei-xiao Liu, Qian Wang, Yuan-ting Wang, Hai-Yan Yu, Chao-ming Tang, Jun Yang, Tao Zhou and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Meiotic Cytokinesis inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fu-ping Wena State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Yue-shuai Guob State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development , Department of Histology and Embryology , Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , Jiangsu , China.
Yang Hua State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Wei-xiao Liua State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Qian Wanga State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Yuan-ting Wanga State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Hai-Yan Yua State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Chao-ming Tanga State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Jun Yangd College of Life Sciences, China West Normal University , Nanchong , China.
Tao Zhoub State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development , Department of Histology and Embryology , Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , Jiangsu , China.
Zhi-ping Xiee School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China.
Jia-hao Shab State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development , Department of Histology and Embryology , Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , Jiangsu , China.
Xuejiang Guob State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development , Department of Histology and Embryology , Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , Jiangsu , China.
Wei Lia State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNNanjing Medical University · CNChina West Normal University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiosis is a special type of cellular renovation that involves 2 successive cell divisions and a single round of DNA replication. Two major degradation systems, the autophagy-lysosome and the ubiquitin-proteasome, are involved in meiosis, but their roles have yet to be elucidated. Here we show that autophagy mainly affects the initiation of meiosis but not the nuclear division. Autophagy works not only by serving as a dynamic recycling system but also by eliminating some negative meiotic regulators such as Ego4 (Ynr034w-a). In a quantitative proteomics study, the proteasome was found to be significantly upregulated during meiotic divisions. We found that proteasomal activity is essential to the 2 successive meiotic nuclear divisions but not for the initiation of meiosis. Our study defines the roles of autophagy and the proteasome in meiosis: Autophagy mainly affects the initiation of meiosis, whereas the proteasome mainly affects the 2 successive meiotic divisions.

Indexed as

AutophagyMeiosisDNA ReplicationDown-RegulationPachytene StageProphaseProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein BindingProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsRibosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTime FactorsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsautophagymeiosisproteasomequantitative proteomicsyeast

Identifiers

PMID27050457
PMCPMC4835973
OpenAlexW2314953381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.