Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27049915›Full record

Trial reportJAMA psychiatry2016

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Anterior Limb of the Internal Capsule for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Isidoor O Bergfeld, Mariska Mantione, Mechteld L C Hoogendoorn, Henricus G Ruhé, Peter Notten, Jan van Laarhoven, Ieke Visser, Martijn Figee, Bart P de Kwaasteniet, Ferdinand Horst and 5 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 139 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03254017 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Remotely Programmed Deep Brain Stimulation of the Bilateral Habenula for Treatment- Resistant Major Depression: An Open Label Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled2ConditionsTreatment Resistant Major Depressive DisorderArmsBilateral surgical implantation of DBS system to Habeluna, Follow-up Period
NCT03347487 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Bilateral Habenula for Treatment- Resistant Major Depression: An Open Label Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2017 to 2021Enrolled7ConditionsTreatment Resistant Major Depression DisorderArmsDeep brain stimuation system implantation
NCT04530942 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy and Prediction of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, Deep Brain StimulationArmsDeep brain stimulation(Active), Deep brain stimulation(Sham)
NCT05327387 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Model-based Electrical Brain Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2022 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsMedication Refractory Epilepsy Patients With Electrodes Already Implanted Based on Clinical Criteria for Standard MonitoringArmsmodel-based electrical brain stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 319 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Superolateral medial forebrain bundle deep brain stimulation in major depression: a gateway trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Isidoor O BergfeldDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands2Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mariska MantioneDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mechteld L C HoogendoornDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henricus G RuhéDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands3Department of Psychiatry, Mood and Anxiety Disorders, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Peter NottenDepartment of Psychiatry, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Jan van LaarhovenDepartment of Psychiatry, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Ieke VisserPsyWorks, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn FigeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands2Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bart P de KwaastenietDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ferdinand HorstDepartment of Psychiatry, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Aart H ScheneDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands6Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands7Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud Univ.
Pepijn van den MunckhofDepartment of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Guus BeuteDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Rick SchuurmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Damiaan DenysDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands2Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, Amsterdam, the Netherlands10Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amste.
University of Amsterdam · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) do not respond sufficiently to several consecutive treatments for major depressive disorder. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment for these patients, but presently placebo effects cannot be ruled out.

objectiveTo assess the efficacy of DBS of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC), controlling for placebo effects with active and sham stimulation phases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsTwenty-five patients with TRD from 2 hospitals in the Netherlands were enrolled between March 22, 2010, and May 8, 2014. Patients first entered a 52-week open-label trial during which they received bilateral implants of 4 contact electrodes followed by optimization of DBS until a stable response was achieved. A randomized, double-blind, 12-week crossover phase was then conducted with patients receiving active treatment followed by sham or vice versa. Response and nonresponse to treatment were determined using intention-to-treat analyses.

interventionsDeep brain stimulation targeted to the vALIC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The change in the investigator-rated score of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) was the main outcome used in analysis of the optimization phase. The primary outcome of the crossover phase was the difference in the HAM-D-17 scores between active and sham DBS. The score range of this tool is 0 to 52, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms. Patients were classified as responders to treatment (≥50% decrease of the HAM-D-17 score compared with baseline) and partial responders (≥25 but <50% decrease of the HAM-D-17 score).

resultsOf 25 patients included in the study, 8 (32%) were men; the mean (SD) age at inclusion was 53.2 (8.4) years. Mean HAM-D-17 scores decreased from 22.2 (95% CI, 20.3-24.1) at baseline to 15.9 (95% CI, 12.3-19.5) (P = .001), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores from 34.0 (95% CI, 31.8-36.3) to 23.8 (95% CI, 18.4-29.1) (P < .001), and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report scores from from 49.3 (95% CI, 45.4-53.2) to 38.8 (95% CI, 31.6-46.0) (P = .005) in the optimization phase. Following the optimization phase, which lasted 51.6 (22.0) weeks, 10 patients (40%) were classified as responders and 15 individuals (60%) as nonresponders. Sixteen patients entered the randomized crossover phase (9 responders [56%], 7 nonresponders [44%]). During active DBS, patients scored significantly lower on the HAM-D-17 scale (13.6 [95% CI, 9.8-17.4]) than during sham DBS (23.1 [95% CI, 20.6-25.6]) (P < .001). Serious adverse events included severe nausea during surgery (1 patient), suicide attempt (4 patients), and suicidal ideation (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Deep brain stimulation of the vALIC resulted in a significant decrease of depressive symptoms in 10 of 25 patients and was tolerated well. The randomized crossover design corroborates that vALIC DBS causes symptom reduction rather than sham.

trial registrationtrialregister.nl Identifier: NTR2118.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesDeep Brain StimulationDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDouble-Blind MethodElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisInternal CapsuleMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27049915
OpenAlexW2315767303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.