Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27049694›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Gender inequalities in excess adiposity and anaemia combine in a large double burden of malnutrition gap detrimental to women in an urban area in North Africa.

Pierre Traissac, Jalila El Ati, Agnès Gartner, Houda Ben Gharbia, Francis Delpeuch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre Traissac1IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement),NUTRIPASS Unit,IRD-UM-SupAgro,911 avenue Agropolis,34394 Montpellier,France.
Jalila El Ati2INNTA (National Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology) & SURVEN (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology in Tunisia) Research Laboratory,Bab Saadoun,Tunis,Tunisia.
Agnès Gartner1IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement),NUTRIPASS Unit,IRD-UM-SupAgro,911 avenue Agropolis,34394 Montpellier,France.
Houda Ben Gharbia2INNTA (National Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology) & SURVEN (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology in Tunisia) Research Laboratory,Bab Saadoun,Tunis,Tunisia.
Francis Delpeuch1IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement),NUTRIPASS Unit,IRD-UM-SupAgro,911 avenue Agropolis,34394 Montpellier,France.
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRInstitut National de Nutrition et de Technologie Alimentaire · TNAgropolis International · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe nutrition transition has exacerbated the gender gap in health in the Middle East and North Africa region as the increase in excess adiposity has been much higher among women than men. This is not exclusive of the persistence of anaemia, generally also more prevalent among women. We assessed the magnitude and sociodemographic factors associated with gender inequality vis-à-vis the double burden of excess adiposity and anaemia.

designCross-sectional study, stratified two-stage cluster sample. BMI (=weight/height2) ≥25·0 kg/m2 defined overweight and BMI≥30·0 kg/m2 obesity. Anaemia was defined as Hb <120 g/l for women, <130 g/l for men. Gender inequalities vis-à-vis the within-subject coexistence of excess adiposity and anaemia were assessed by women v. men relative prevalence ratios (RPR). Their variation with sociodemographic characteristics used models including gender × covariate interactions.

settingGreater Tunis area in 2009-2010. SUBJECTS: Adults aged 20-49 years (women, n 1689; men, n 930).

resultsGender inequalities in excess adiposity were high (e.g. overweight: women 64·9 % v. men 48·4 %; RPR=2·1; 95 % CI 1·6, 2·7) and much higher for anaemia (women 38·0 % v. men 7·2 %; RPR=8·2; 95 % CI 5·5, 12·4). They were striking for overweight and anaemia (women 24·1 % v. men 3·4 %; RPR=16·2; 95 % CI 10·3, 25·4). Gender inequalities in overweight adjusted for covariates increased with age but decreased with professional activity and household wealth score; gender inequality in anaemia or overweight and anaemia was more uniformly distributed.

conclusionsWomen were much more at risk than men, from both over- and undernutrition perspectives. Both the underlying gender-related and sex-linked biological determinants of this remarkable double burden of malnutrition inequality must be addressed to promote gender equity in health.

Indexed as

Sex FactorsAdiposityAdultAnemiaBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedObesityOverweightPrevalenceTunisiaUrban PopulationAnaemiaDouble burden of malnutritionGenderMiddle East and North AfricaOverweight

Identifiers

PMID27049694
PMCPMC10273257
OpenAlexW2314954239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.