Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27049034›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2016

The 2015 Dutch food-based dietary guidelines.

D Kromhout, C J K Spaaij, J de Goede, R M Weggemans

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 207 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
207citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
30.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03394963 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Scientific Foundations for Developing and Validating Food-based Dietary Guidelines and a Healthy Eating Index for Ethiopia

TypeobservationalSponsorEthiopian Public Health InstituteRan2019 to 2022Enrolled500ConditionsHealthyArmsFood-based dietary guidelines for healthier diet
NCT07459140 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Nutri-plus Module

TypeinterventionalSponsorTNORan2022 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsDietary AssessmentArmsThe Nutri-plus module
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

207 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 394 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Cumulative Meta-Analysis of the Soy Effect Over Time.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D KromhoutThe Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands.
C J K SpaaijThe Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands.
J de GoedeThe Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands.
R M WeggemansThe Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands.
The Health Council of the Netherlands · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to derive food-based dietary guidelines for the Dutch population. The dietary guidelines are based on 29 systematic reviews of English language meta-analyses in PubMed summarizing randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies on nutrients, foods and food patterns and the risk of 10 major chronic diseases: coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, diabetes, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia and depression. The committee also selected three causal risk factors for cardiovascular diseases or diabetes: systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and body weight. Findings were categorized as strong or weak evidence, inconsistent effects, too little evidence or effect unlikely for experimental and observational data separately. Next, the committee selected only findings with a strong level of evidence for deriving the guidelines. Convincing evidence was based on strong evidence from the experimental data either or not in combination with strong evidence from prospective cohort studies. Plausible evidence was based on strong evidence from prospective cohort studies only. A general guideline to eat a more plant food-based dietary pattern and limit consumption of animal-based food and 15 specific guidelines have been formulated. There are 10 new guidelines on legumes, nuts, meat, dairy produce, cereal products, fats and oils, tea, coffee and sugar-containing beverages. Three guidelines on vegetables, fruits, fish and alcoholic beverages have been sharpened, and the 2006 guideline on salt stayed the same. A separate guideline has been formulated on nutrient supplements. Completely food-based dietary guidelines can be derived in a systematic and transparent way.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDietFoodFruitHumansNetherlandsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReview Literature as TopicSeafoodVegetables

Identifiers

PMID27049034
PMCPMC5399142
OpenAlexW2321397508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.