Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27048955›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Imaging of Angiotropism/Vascular Co-Option in a Murine Model of Brain Melanoma: Implications for Melanoma Progression along Extravascular Pathways.

Laurent A Bentolila, Roshini Prakash, Daniela Mihic-Probst, Madhuri Wadehra, Hynda K Kleinman, Thomas S Carmichael, Bruno Péault, Raymond L Barnhill, Claire Lugassy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Underpinnings of Brain Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The origin of brain malignancies at the blood-brain barrier.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Emerging Studies of Melanoma Brain Metastasis.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Laurent A BentolilaCalifornia NanoSystems Institute, Los Angeles, CA, 90095 USA.
Roshini PrakashDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095 USA.
Daniela Mihic-ProbstInstitute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Madhuri WadehraDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hynda K KleinmanNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Thomas S CarmichaelDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095 USA.
Bruno PéaultOrthopedic Hospital Research Center and Broad Stem Cell Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Raymond L BarnhillDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, and University of Paris Réne Descartes, Paris, France.
Claire LugassyDepartment of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
University of California, Los Angeles · USInstitut Curie · FRBroad Center · USCalifornia NanoSystems Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Medical Research Council G1000816NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiotropism/pericytic mimicry and vascular co-option involve tumor cell interactions with the abluminal vascular surface. These two phenomena may be closely related. However, investigations of the two processes have developed in an independent fashion and different explanations offered as to their biological nature. Angiotropism describes the propensity of tumor cells to spread distantly via continuous migration along abluminal vascular surfaces, or extravascular migratory metastasis (EVMM). Vascular co-option has been proposed as an alternative mechanism by which tumors cells may gain access to a blood supply. We have used a murine brain melanoma model to analyze the interactions of GFP human melanoma cells injected into the mouse brain with red fluorescent lectin-labeled microvascular channels. Results have shown a striking spread of melanoma cells along preexisting microvascular channels and features of both vascular co-option and angiotropism/pericytic mimicry. This study has also documented the perivascular expression of Serpin B2 by angiotropic melanoma cells in the murine brain and in human melanoma brain metastases. Our findings suggest that vascular co-option and angiotropism/pericytic mimicry are closely related if not identical processes. Further studies are needed in order to establish whether EVMM is an alternative form of cancer metastasis in addition to intravascular cancer dissemination.

Indexed as

MicrocirculationAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionFemaleGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansLectinsLuminescent ProteinsMelanomaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasm MetastasisGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLectinsLuminescent ProteinsPlasminogen Activator Inhibitor 2Red Fluorescent Protein

Identifiers

PMID27048955
PMCPMC4822155
OpenAlexW2316855600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.