ReviewAsian journal of andrology
Advances in the management of infertility in men with spinal cord injury.
Review in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral probenecid improves sperm motility in men with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2018Trial
- Spinal Cord Injury-Related Male Infertility: Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Sperm DNA Damage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sexual Dysfunction and Infertility in Male Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Effects of Melissa officinalis extract in the expression of NLRP3 gene in testicular tissue and sperm parameters in the male rat model of spinal cord injury.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
- Constructing and Validating a Network of Potential Olfactory Sheathing Cell Transplants Regulating Spinal Cord Injury Progression.Molecular neurobiology · 2023Article
- Effects of autonomic nervous system disorders on male infertility.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Sexuality, Intimacy, and Reproductive Health after Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- The impact of male factors and their correct and early diagnosis in the infertile couple's pathway: 2021 perspectives.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022Review
- Male Sexual Dysfunction and Infertility in Spinal Cord Injury Patients: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Management of male factor infertility: position statement from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) : Endorsing Organization: Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction, and Research (SIERR).Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022Article
- Penile Vibratory Stimulation for Semen Retrieval in Men with Spinal Cord Injury: Patient Perspectives.Research and reports in urology · 2022Review
- Clinical Predictors of Vibrator-Assisted Ejaculation following Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2021Article
- From disability to fatherhood: Journey of serving soldiers with spinal cord injury.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a re-engineered device for penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2021Article
- Spinal Cord Injury Causes Reduction ofFrontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Successful conception using home intravaginal insemination following spinal cord injury in a man.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020Article
- A Primary Care Provider's Guide to Sexual Health for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Reduces Gastrin-Releasing Peptide in the Spinal Ejaculation Generator in Male Rats.Journal of neurotrauma · 2019Article
- Fertility and sexuality in the spinal cord injury patient.World journal of urology · 2018Review
- Improvement of Sexual and Reproductive Function in Men with Spinal Cord Lesion.Acta clinica Croatica · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Couples with a spinal cord injured male partner require assisted ejaculation techniques to collect semen that can then be further used in various assisted reproductive technology methods to achieve a pregnancy. The majority of men sustaining a spinal cord injury regardless of the cause or the level of injury cannot ejaculate during sexual intercourse. Only a small minority can ejaculate by masturbation. Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation are the two most common methods used to retrieve sperm. Other techniques such as prostatic massage and the adjunct application of other medications can be used, but the results are inconsistent. Surgical sperm retrieval should be considered as a last resort if all other methods fail. Special attention must be paid to patients with T6 and rostral levels of injury due to the risk of autonomic dysreflexia resulting from stimulation below the level of injury. Bladder preparation should be performed before stimulation if retrograde ejaculation is anticipated. Erectile dysfunction is ubiquitous in the spinal cord injured population but is usually easily managed and does not pose a barrier to semen retrieval in these men. Semen analysis parameters of men with spinal cord injury are unique for this population regardless of the method of retrieval, generally presenting as normal sperm concentration but abnormally low sperm motility and viability. When sperm retrieval is desired in this population, emphasis should be placed on initially trying the simple methods of penile vibratory stimulation or electroejaculation before resorting to more advanced and invasive surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.