Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27048617›Full record

ReviewHepatology international2016

The role of bile salts in liver regeneration.

Liyanne F M van de Laarschot, Peter L M Jansen, Frank G Schaap, Steven W M Olde Damink

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer treatment and research · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Protection of liver sinusoids by intravenous administration of human Muse cells in a rat extra-small partial liver transplantation model.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Hepatoprotective Plants from Bangladesh: A Biophytochemical Review and Future Prospect.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  16. Liver Regeneration after Hepatectomy and Partial Liver Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liyanne F M van de LaarschotDepartment of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter L M JansenDepartment of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frank G SchaapDepartment of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. frank.schaap@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Steven W M Olde DaminkDepartment of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that bile salts are important for liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy. The relative bile salt overload after partial liver resection causes activation of bile salt receptors in non-parenchymal (viz. the plasma membrane receptor TGR5) and parenchymal (viz. the intracellular receptor FXR) cells in the liver, thus, providing signals to the regenerative process. Impaired bile salt signaling in mice with genetic deficiency of Tgr5 or Fxr results in delayed liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy, and is accompanied by mortality in case of Fxr knock-out mice. Conversely, compensatory liver re-growth in hepatectomized mice can be stimulated by feeding of bile salts or alisol B 23-acetate, a natural triterpenoid agonist of Fxr. A large number of animal studies underscore the importance of strict maintenance of bile salt homeostasis for proper progression of liver regeneration. Both ileal and hepatic Fxr play a key role in regulation of bile salt homeostasis and, thus, preventing hepatotoxicity caused by excessive levels of bile salts. They further contribute to liver regeneration by induction of mitogenic factors. Agents that target bile salt receptors hold promise as drugs to stimulate liver regeneration in selected patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBile Acids and SaltsHepatectomyHumansLiver RegenerationMiceReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionBile Acids and SaltsReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledBile salt homeostasisBile salt signalingFarnesoid X receptorLiver regenerationLiver surgery

Identifiers

PMID27048617
PMCPMC5003899
OpenAlexW2316555731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.