Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27048557›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2016

Micro- and nanoparticulates for DNA vaccine delivery.

Eric Farris, Deborah M Brown, Amanda E Ramer-Tait, Angela K Pannier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Research Progress on Liposome Pulmonary Delivery ofJournal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric FarrisDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Deborah M BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Amanda E Ramer-TaitDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Angela K PannierDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Center for Nanohybrid Functional Materials, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Mary and Dick Holland Regenerative Medicine Program, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA apannier2@unl.edu.

Funding

The role of stress in the fetal origin of obesity and metabolic dysfunctionP20GM104320 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI ZEMPLENI, JANOS · 2014 to 2024
$24.9M
Nebraska Center for VirologyP30GM103509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI WOOD, CHARLES · 2012 to 2014
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104320NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA vaccination has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional protein-based vaccines for the induction of protective immune responses. DNA vaccines offer several advantages over traditional vaccines, including increased stability, rapid and inexpensive production, and flexibility to produce vaccines for a wide variety of infectious diseases. However, the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines delivered as naked plasmid DNA is often weak due to degradation of the DNA by nucleases and inefficient delivery to immune cells. Therefore, biomaterial-based delivery systems based on micro- and nanoparticles that encapsulate plasmid DNA represent the most promising strategy for DNA vaccine delivery. Microparticulate delivery systems allow for passive targeting to antigen presenting cells through size exclusion and can allow for sustained presentation of DNA to cells through degradation and release of encapsulated vaccines. In contrast, nanoparticle encapsulation leads to increased internalization, overall greater transfection efficiency, and the ability to increase uptake across mucosal surfaces. Moreover, selection of the appropriate biomaterial can lead to increased immune stimulation and activation through triggering innate immune response receptors and target DNA to professional antigen presenting cells. Finally, the selection of materials with the appropriate properties to achieve efficient delivery through administration routes conducive to high patient compliance and capable of generating systemic and local (i.e. mucosal) immunity can lead to more effective humoral and cellular protective immune responses. In this review, we discuss the development of novel biomaterial-based delivery systems to enhance the delivery of DNA vaccines through various routes of administration and their implications for generating immune responses.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansInfusions, ParenteralLipidsLiposomesNanoparticlesPolymersVaccines, DNALipidsLiposomesPolymersVaccines, DNAbiomaterialsDNA vaccineoral deliverytransfectionvaccination

Identifiers

PMID27048557
PMCPMC4950349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.