Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27048405›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2016

Higher diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness using procalcitonin in the treatment of emergency medicine patients with fever (The HiTEMP study): a multicenter randomized study.

Yuri van der Does, Maarten Limper, Stephanie C E Schuit, Marten J Poley, Joost van Rosmalen, Christian Ramakers, Peter Patka, Eric C M van Gorp, Pleunie P M Rood

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuri van der DoesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. y.vanderdoes@erasmusmc.nl.
Maarten LimperDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephanie C E SchuitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marten J PoleyInstitute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost van RosmalenDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian RamakersDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter PatkaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric C M van GorpDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pleunie P M RoodDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFever is a common symptom in the emergency department(ED). Fever can be caused by bacterial infections, which are treated with antibiotics. Often, bacterial infections cannot be ruled out in the ED using standard diagnostics, and empiric antibiotic treatment is started. Procalcitonin(PCT) is a biomarker for bacterial infections, but its role in an undifferentiated ED population remains unclear. We hypothesize that PCT-guided therapy may reduce antibiotics prescription in undifferentiated febrile ED patients. The primary objectives of this study are to determine a) the efficacy, b) the safety of PCT-guided therapy, and c) the accuracy of the biomarker PCT for bacterial infections. The secondary objective is to study the cost-effectiveness of PCT-guided therapy. METHODS/

designThis is a multicenter noninferiority randomized controlled trial. All adult ED patients with fever(≥38.2 °C) are randomized between standard care with and without the addition of a PCT level, after written informed consent. a) For efficacy, the reduction of patients receiving antibiotics is calculated, using a superiority analysis: differences between the PCT-guided group and control group are assessed using a Fisher's exact test, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis to account for the effects of demographic and medical variables on the percentage of febrile patients receiving antibiotics. b) Safety consists of a composite endpoint, defined as mortality, intensive care admission and ED return visit within 14 days. Noninferiority of PCT will be tested using a one-sided 95 % confidence interval for the difference in the composite safety endpoint between the PCT-guided and control groups using a noninferiority margin of 7.5 %. c) Accuracy of PCT and CRP for the diagnosis of bacterial infections will be reported, using the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve in the definitive diagnosis of bacterial infections. The sample size is 550 patients, which was calculated using a power analysis for all primary objectives. Enrollment of patients started in August 2014 and will last 2 years. DISCUSSION: PCT may offer a more tailor-made treatment to the individual ED patient with fever. Prospective costs analyses will reveal the economic consequences of implementing PCT-guided therapy in the ED. THIS TRIAL IS REGISTERED IN THE DUTCH TRIAL REGISTER: NTR4949.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCost-Benefit AnalysisC-Reactive ProteinFemaleFeverHumansMaleProtein PrecursorsCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinProtein PrecursorsAntibioticsC-Reactive proteinEmergency medicineFeverProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID27048405
PMCPMC4822275
OpenAlexW2325655174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.