Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27048205›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2017

Phantom smoking among young adult bar patrons.

Jamie Guillory, Nadra Lisha, Youn Ok Lee, Pamela M Ling

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2019
    Article
  6. Preventing Smoking Progression in Young Adults: the Concept of Prevescalation.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
  7. "BMJ open · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie GuilloryRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9765-2299
Nadra LishaCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Youn Ok LeeRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Pamela M LingCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
RTI International · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Countering Young Adult Tobacco Marketing in BarsU01CA154240 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2011 to 2015
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the prevalence and sociodemographic makeup of smokers who do not self-identify as smokers (ie, phantom smokers) compared with self-identifying smokers in a sample of bar-going young adults aged 18-30 years to more accurately assess young adult prevalence of smoking and inform cessation message targeting.

methodsCross-sectional surveys of smokers (n=3089) were conducted in randomly selected bars/nightclubs in seven US cities. Logistic regression models assessed associations between phantom smoking (past 30-day smoking and denial of being a smoker), tobacco and alcohol use behaviours (eg, social smoking, nicotine dependence, smoking while drinking, past 30-day alcohol use) and demographics.

resultsCompared with smokers, phantom smokers were more likely to be college graduates (OR=1.43, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.98) and to identify themselves as social smokers (OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.12). Phantom smokers had lower odds of smoking while drinking (OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.32), being nicotine dependent (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.76) and having quit for at least 1 day in the last year (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.69) compared with smokers.

conclusionsThis research extends phantom smoking literature on college students to provide a broader picture of phantom smoking among young adults in high-risk contexts and of varying levels of educational attainment. Phantom smokers may be particularly sensitive to social pressures against smoking, suggesting the importance of identifying smoking as a behaviour (rather than identity) in cessation messaging to ensure that phantom smokers are reached.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrevalenceRestaurantsSmokersSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Use DisorderUnited StatesDenormalizationPriority/special populationsSurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID27048205
PMCPMC5067225
OpenAlexW2318577139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.