Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27048154›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2016

Coronavirus Infection and Diversity in Bats in the Australasian Region.

C S Smith, C E de Jong, J Meers, J Henning, L- F Wang, H E Field

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C S SmithSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia. craig.smith@daf.qld.gov.au.
C E de JongDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, Brisbane, QLD, 4108, Australia.
J MeersSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.
J HenningSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.
L- F WangProgram in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
H E FieldDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, Brisbane, QLD, 4108, Australia.
Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUDuke-NUS Medical School · SGEcoHealth Alliance · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the SARS outbreak, extensive surveillance was undertaken globally to detect and identify coronavirus diversity in bats. This study sought to identify the diversity and prevalence of coronaviruses in bats in the Australasian region. We identified four different genotypes of coronavirus, three of which (an alphacoronavirus and two betacoronaviruses) are potentially new species, having less than 90% nucleotide sequence identity with the most closely related described viruses. We did not detect any SARS-like betacoronaviruses, despite targeting rhinolophid bats, the putative natural host taxa. Our findings support the virus-host co-evolution hypothesis, with the detection of Miniopterus bat coronavirus HKU8 (previously reported in Miniopterus species in China, Hong Kong and Bulgaria) in Australian Miniopterus species. Similarly, we detected a novel betacoronavirus genotype from Pteropus alecto which is most closely related to Bat coronavirus HKU9 identified in other pteropodid bats in China, Kenya and the Philippines. We also detected possible cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses, and the apparent enteric tropism of these viruses. Thus, our findings are consistent with a scenario wherein the current diversity and host specificity of coronaviruses reflects co-evolution with the occasional host shift.

Indexed as

AnimalsAustralasiaBase SequenceChiropteraCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsGenome, ViralGenotypePhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceRNA, ViralSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeTaiwanRNA, ViralAsiaAustraliabatcoronavirusdiversitySARS

Identifiers

PMID27048154
PMCPMC7087777
OpenAlexW2316974386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.