Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047983›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2016

A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Michael J Anderson, William M Browning, Christopher E Urband, Melissa A Kluczynski, Leslie J Bisson

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05923710 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With and Without Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis for Proximal ACL Tears: A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital OrganizationRan2020 to 2023Enrolled38ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament TearArmsPrimary anterior cruciate ligament repair, Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair and lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with iliotibial band
NCT06357091 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

ACL Reconstruction With Human Allograft Cortical Bone Screw (Shark Screw®) or Biocomposite-interference Screws - a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexander Rofner-MorettiRan2026 to 2034Enrolled80ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryArmsACL reconstruction with Shark Screw ACL®, ACL reconstruction with biocomposite screw (Mecta)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Suture tape augmentation in the management of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Early or delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is one superior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Functional leg performance 2 years after ACL surgery: a comparison between InternalBrace™-augmented repair versus reconstruction versus healthy controls.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael J AndersonThe State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
William M BrowningThe State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Christopher E UrbandThe State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Melissa A KluczynskiThe State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Leslie J BissonThe State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been a substantial increase in the amount of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). PURPOSE: To quantify the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the ACL in the past decade and to provide an overall summary of this literature. STUDY

designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

methodsA systematic review of all ACL-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between January 2004 and September 2014 was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database. Narrative reviews and non-English articles were excluded.

resultsA total of 1031 articles were found, of which 240 met the inclusion criteria. Included articles were summarized and divided into 17 topics: anatomy, epidemiology, prevention, associated injuries, diagnosis, operative versus nonoperative management, graft choice, surgical technique, fixation methods, computer-assisted surgery, platelet-rich plasma, rehabilitation, return to play, outcomes assessment, arthritis, complications, and miscellaneous.

conclusionA summary of systematic reviews on the ACL can supply the surgeon with a single source for the most up-to-date synthesis of the literature.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentmeta-analysissurgerysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27047983
PMCPMC4794976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.