ArticleApplied & translational genomics2016
Ethical issues in consumer genome sequencing: Use of consumers' samples and data.
Article in Applied & translational genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Has the Rise of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing Impacted Genetic Counselling Practice? A Scoping Review.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
- Toward owner governance in genomic data privacy with Governome.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Proxy panels enable privacy-aware outsourcing of genotype imputation.Genome research · 2025Article
- Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- A Social and Ethical Framework for Providing Health Information Obtained from Combining Genetics and Fitness Tracking Data.Technology in society · 2023Article
- Ethics of Buying DNA.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2022Article
- Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes about Privacy and Secondary Data Use among African-Americans Using Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.Public health genomics · 2022Article
- Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests.Genes · 2021Review
- Article
- Secondary Data Usage in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: To What Extent Are Customers Aware and Concerned?Public health genomics · 2021Article
- Privacy challenges and research opportunities for genomic data sharing.Nature genetics · 2020Review
- Worldwide human mitochondrial haplogroup distribution from urban sewage.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019Article
- Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019Article
- Perceptions of students in health and molecular life sciences regarding pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.Human genomics · 2018Article
- Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
- VarAFT: a variant annotation and filtration system for human next generation sequencing data.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper.Journal of community genetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High throughput approaches such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) create an unprecedented amount of data providing powerful resources for clinical care and research. Recently, WGS and WES services have been made available by commercial direct-to-consumer (DTC) companies. The DTC offer of genetic testing (GT) has already brought attention to potentially problematic issues such as the adequacy of consumers' informed consent and transparency of companies' research activities. In this study, we analysed the websites of four DTC GT companies offering WGS and/or WES with regard to their policies governing storage and future use of consumers' data and samples. The results are discussed in relation to recommendations and guiding principles such as the "Statement of the European Society of Human Genetics on DTC GT for health-related purposes" (2010) and the "Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data" (Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, 2014). The analysis reveals that some companies may store and use consumers' samples or sequencing data for unspecified research and share the data with third parties. Moreover, the companies do not provide sufficient or clear information to consumers about this, which can undermine the validity of the consent process. Furthermore, while all companies state that they provide privacy safeguards for data and mention the limitations of these, information about the possibility of re-identification is lacking. Finally, although the companies that may conduct research do include information regarding proprietary claims and commercialisation of the results, it is not clear whether consumers are aware of the consequences of these policies. These results indicate that DTC GT companies still need to improve the transparency regarding handling of consumers' samples and data, including having an explicit and clear consent process for research activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.