ArticleInternational journal of family medicine2016
General Practitioners' Participation in a Large, Multicountry Combined General Practitioner-Patient Survey: Recruitment Procedures and Participation Rate.
Article in International journal of family medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05766852 (Potential Benefits of the Somatic Psychoeducational Intervention for Improving the Health and Wellness of Healthcare Providers), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Potential Benefits of the Somatic Psychoeducational Intervention for Improving the Health and Wellness of Healthcare Providers
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recruiting Dental Practices for Research: Insights from a Practice-Based Trial in Germany.JDR clinical and translational research · 2026Article
- International survey of people living with chronic conditions (PaRIS survey): effects of general practitioner non-participation on the representativeness of the Norwegian patient data.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Recruitment, data collection, participation rate, and representativeness of the international cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study across 38 countries.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Social concordance and patient reported experiences in countries with different gender equality: a multinational survey.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Primary care involvement in clinical research - prerequisites, motivators, and barriers: results from a study series.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Experiences with Innovation Fund healthcare models in primary care: a qualitative study amongst German general practitioners.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2024Article
- Case-mix adjustments for patient reported experience and outcome measures in primary care: an empirical approach to identify patient characteristics as case-mix adjusters based on a secondary analysis of an international survey among patients and their general practitioners in 34 countries.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Quick adaptation of the organisation of general practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- GPs' involvement in specialised palliative home care: A mixed methods study in Germany.The European journal of general practice · 2022Article
- Influence of Palliative Care Qualifications on the Job Stress Factors of General Practitioners in Palliative Care: A Survey Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Task shifting from general practitioners to practice assistants and nurses in primary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
- [The German Innovation Fund and primary care-What expectations and experiences do general practitioners have with regard to participating in innovative care models?]Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022Article
- Migrant GPs and patients: a cross-sectional study of practice characteristics, patient experiences and migration concordance.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
- Designing and describing an electronic referral system to facilitate direct hospital admissions.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Improving primary palliative care - a Delphi consensus study on measures for general practice in Germany.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Task shifting from general practitioners to practice assistants and nurses in primary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.Primary health care research & development · 2021Article
- Good communication was valued as more important than accessibility according to 707 Nordic primary care patients: a report from the QUALICOPC study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2021Article
- Article
- Job satisfaction of general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.Human resources for health · 2021Article
- Physical accessibility of primary care facilities for people with disabilities: a cross-sectional survey in 31 countries.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. The participation of general practitioners (GPs) is essential in research on the performance of primary care. This paper describes the implementation of a large, multicountry study in primary care that combines a survey among GPs and a linked survey among patients that visited their practice (the QUALICOPC study). The aim is to describe the recruitment procedure and explore differences between countries in the participation rate of the GPs. Methods. Descriptive analyses were used to document recruitment procedures and to assess hypotheses potentially explaining variation in participation rates between countries. Results. The survey was implemented in 31 European countries. GPs were mainly selected through random sampling. The actual implementation of the study differed between countries. The median participation rate was 30%. Both material (such as the payment system of GPs in a country) and immaterial influences (such as estimated survey pressure) are related to differences between countries. Conclusion. This study shows that the participation of GPs may indeed be influenced by the context of the country. The implementation of complex data collection is difficult to realize in a completely uniform way. Procedures have to be tuned to the context of the country.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.