ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2016
The Quest toward limb regeneration: a regenerative engineering approach.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinspired hydrogel-based regenerative engineering strategies for the structural and functional regeneration of skeletal muscles following volumetric muscle loss.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Osteoinductive low-dose 3D porous calcium phosphate graphene oxide-integrated matrices enhance osteogenesis and mechanical properties.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Derived Hydrogels: a Powerful Class of Biomaterials for Skeletal Muscle Regenerative Engineering Applications.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Magnesium phosphate functionalized graphene oxide and PLGA composite matrices with enhanced mechanical and osteogenic properties for bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Development of porcine skeletal muscle extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels with improved properties and low immunogenicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Regenerative engineering of long bones using the small molecule forskolin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals.Biology · 2023Article
- MSCs-laden silk Fibroin/GelMA hydrogels with incorporation of platelet-rich plasma for chondrogenic construct.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Regenerative engineering: a review of recent advances and future directions.Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Control of mesenchymal cell fate via application of FGF-8b in vitro.Stem cell research · 2021Article
- Graphene-Based Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of the Field and Considerations Regarding Biocompatibility and Biodegradation.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Review
- Bioinspired Scaffold Designs for Regenerating Musculoskeletal Tissue Interfaces.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2020Article
- Emergence of the Stem Cell Secretome in Regenerative Engineering.Trends in biotechnology · 2020Review
- Robust phenotypic maintenance of limb cells during heterogeneous culture in a physiologically relevant polymeric-based constructed graft system.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Skeletal Muscle Regenerative Engineering.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2019Article
- Engineering multicellular systems: using synthetic biology to control tissue self-organization.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2017Article
- Mechanisms of urodele limb regeneration.Regeneration (Oxford, England) · 2017Review
- Harnessing cAMP signaling in musculoskeletal regenerative engineering.Drug discovery today · 2017Review
- Regenerative Engineering for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Biomaterials and Cell-Based Technologies.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Holy Grail to address the clinical grand challenge of human limb loss is to develop innovative strategies to regrow the amputated limb. The remarkable advances in the scientific understanding of regeneration, stem cell science, material science and engineering, physics and novel surgical approaches in the past few decades have provided a regenerative tool box to face this grand challenge and address the limitations of human wound healing. Here we discuss the convergence approach put forward by the field of Regenerative Engineering to use the regenerative tool box to design and develop novel translational strategies to limb regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.