Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047581›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2016

The Power of Engaging Citizen Scientists for Scientific Progress.

Jeanne Garbarino, Christopher E Mason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antiracist Opportunities in theJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mapping do-it-yourself science.Life sciences, society and policy · 2019
    Article
  13. Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.Citizen science : theory and practice · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeanne GarbarinoScience Outreach Program, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Christopher E MasonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021; The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021; The Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, New York, NY 10021.

Funding

Epigenome Interactions in Complex Neurogenetic DisordersR01NS076465 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MASON, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD, ROSS, MARGARET ELIZABETH · 2011 to 2015
$5.8M
Community Research Education and Engagement for Data Science (CREEDS)R25EB020393 · NIBIB · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CLAUDIO, LUZ, KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2015 to 2017
$578k
NIBIB NIH HHS R25 EB020393NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science has become a powerful force for scientific inquiry, providing researchers with access to a vast array of data points while connecting nonscientists to the authentic process of science. This citizen-researcher relationship creates an incredible synergy, allowing for the creation, execution, and analysis of research projects that would otherwise prove impossible in traditional research settings, namely due to the scope of needed human or financial resources (or both). However, citizen-science projects are not without their challenges. For instance, as projects are scaled up, there is concern regarding the rigor and usability of data collected by citizens who are not formally trained in research science. While these concerns are legitimate, we have seen examples of highly successful citizen-science projects from multiple scientific disciplines that have enhanced our collective understanding of science, such as how RNA molecules fold or determining the microbial metagenomic snapshot of an entire public transportation system. These and other emerging citizen-science projects show how improved protocols for reliable, large-scale science can realize both an improvement of scientific understanding for the general public and novel views of the world around us.

Identifiers

PMID27047581
PMCPMC4798819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.