Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047453›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Species Specificity of Bacteria Associated to the Brown Seaweeds Lobophora (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae) and Their Potential for Induction of Rapid Coral Bleaching in Acropora muricata.

Christophe Vieira, Aschwin H Engelen, Linda Guentas, Tânia Aires, Fanny Houlbreque, Julie Gaubert, Ester A Serrão, Olivier De Clerck, Claude E Payri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bacterial Microbiota ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christophe VieiraIFD, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06Paris, France; UMR ENTROPIE (UR, IRD, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Institut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementNouméa, New Caledonia; Phycology Research Group and Center for Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium.
Aschwin H EngelenCentre of Marine Sciences, University of the Algarve Portugal.
Linda GuentasLaboratoire MAPIEM EA 4323, Université de ToulonLa Garde, France; Laboratoire LIVE, Université de Nouvelle-CalédonieNouméa, New Caledonia.
Tânia AiresCentre of Marine Sciences, University of the Algarve Portugal.
Fanny HoulbrequeUMR ENTROPIE (UR, IRD, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Julie GaubertUMR ENTROPIE (UR, IRD, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Ester A SerrãoCentre of Marine Sciences, University of the Algarve Portugal.
Olivier De ClerckPhycology Research Group and Center for Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Claude E PayriUMR ENTROPIE (UR, IRD, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement Nouméa, New Caledonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While reef degradation is occurring worldwide, it is not uncommon to see phase shifts from coral to macroalgal dominated reefs. Numerous studies have addressed the mechanisms by which macroalgae may outcompete corals and a few recent studies highlighted the putative role of bacteria at the interface between macroalgae and corals. Some studies suggest that macroalgae may act as vectors and/or foster proliferation of microorganisms pathogenic for corals. Using a combination of high throughput sequencing, bacterial culturing, and in situ bioassays we question if the adversity of macroalgal-associated bacteria to corals is mediated by specific bacterial taxa. Using Illumina sequencing, we characterized and compared the bacterial community from two Lobophora (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae) species. The two species presented distinctive bacterial communities. Both species shared approximately half of their OTUs, mainly the most abundant bacteria. Species-specific OTUs belong to Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. In total, 16 culturable bacterial strain were isolated and identified from the Lobophora surface, consisting of 10 genera (from nine families, four classes, and three phyla), some of which are not known as, but are related to pathogens involved in coral diseases, and others are naturally associated to corals. When patches of marine agar with 24 h cultures of each of these bacteria were placed in direct contact with the branches of the scleractinian coral Acropora muricata, they caused severe bleaching after 24 h exposure. Results suggest that regardless of taxonomic affinities, increase in density of these bacteria can be adverse to corals. Nevertheless, the microbial community associated to macroalgal surface may not represent a threat to corals, because the specific bacterial screening and control exerted by the alga preventing specific bacterial proliferation.

Indexed as

coral bleachingIllumina sequencingin situ bioassayLobophoramacroalgal bacterial assemblagemacroalgal–coral interactionmacroalgal culturable epibacteria

Identifiers

PMID27047453
PMCPMC4800410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.