Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047452›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Comparative Analysis of Cellular Immune Responses in Treated Leishmania Patients and Hamsters against Recombinant Th1 Stimulatory Proteins of Leishmania donovani.

Sumit Joshi, Narendra K Yadav, Keerti Rawat, Chandra Dev P Tripathi, Anil K Jaiswal, Prashant Khare, Rati Tandon, Rajendra K Baharia, Sanchita Das, Reema Gupta and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Metabolic Pathways ofPharmaceutics · 2022
    Review
  4. A Chimera of Th1 Stimulatory Proteins ofBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sumit JoshiParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Narendra K YadavParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Keerti RawatParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Chandra Dev P TripathiParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Anil K JaiswalParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Prashant KhareParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Rati TandonParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Rajendra K BahariaParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Sanchita DasParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Reema GuptaParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Pramod K KushawahaParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Shyam SundarDepartment of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, India.
Amogh A SahasrabuddheMolecular and Structural Biology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Anuradha DubeParasitology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, India.
Central Drug Research Institute · INCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our prior studies demonstrated that cellular response of T helper 1 (Th1) type was generated by a soluble antigenic fraction (ranging from 89.9 to 97.1 kDa) of Leishmania donovani promastigote, in treated Leishmania patients as well as hamsters and showed significant prophylactic potential against experimental visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Eighteen Th1 stimulatory proteins were identified through proteomic analysis of this subfraction, out of which 15 were developed as recombinant proteins. In the present work, we have evaluated these 15 recombinant proteins simultaneously for their comparative cellular responses in treated Leishmania patients and hamsters. Six proteins viz. elongation factor-2, enolase, aldolase, triose phosphate isomerase, protein disulfide isomerase, and p45 emerged as most immunogenic as they produced a significant lymphoproliferative response, nitric oxide generation and Th1 cytokine response in PBMCs and lymphocytes of treated Leishmania patients and hamsters respectively. The results suggested that these proteins may be exploited for developing a successful poly-protein and/or poly-epitope vaccine against VL.

Indexed as

cellular responseimmunogenicityLeishmania donovanilymphocytesPBMCsrecombinant Th1 stimulatory proteinstreated Leishmania-infected hamstertreated Leishmania patients

Identifiers

PMID27047452
PMCPMC4801884
OpenAlexW2333623011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.