Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2016

Extensive Direct Subcortical Cerebellum-Basal Ganglia Connections in Human Brain as Revealed by Constrained Spherical Deconvolution Tractography.

Demetrio Milardi, Alessandro Arrigo, Giuseppe Anastasi, Alberto Cacciola, Silvia Marino, Enricomaria Mormina, Alessandro Calamuneri, Daniele Bruschetta, Giuseppina Cutroneo, Fabio Trimarchi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Neural subtypes in developmental stuttering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Probabilistic mapping and automated segmentation of human brainstem white matter bundles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Preoperative Functional Connectivity Predicts Antiparkinson Drug Change after Deep Brain Stimulation.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cerebellar Contributions to the Basal Ganglia Influence Motor Coordination, Reward Processing, and Movement Vigor.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Demetrio MilardiIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", MessinaItaly; Department of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
Alessandro ArrigoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Giuseppe AnastasiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Alberto CacciolaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Silvia MarinoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", MessinaItaly; Department of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
Enricomaria MorminaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Alessandro CalamuneriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Daniele BruschettaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Giuseppina CutroneoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Fabio TrimarchiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina Messina, Italy.
Angelo QuartaroneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", MessinaItaly; Department of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITCentro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The connections between the cerebellum and basal ganglia were assumed to occur at the level of neocortex. However evidences from animal data have challenged this old perspective showing extensive subcortical pathways linking the cerebellum with the basal ganglia. Here we tested the hypothesis if these connections also exist between the cerebellum and basal ganglia in the human brain by using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and tractography. Fifteen healthy subjects were analyzed by using constrained spherical deconvolution technique obtained with a 3T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. We found extensive connections running between the subthalamic nucleus and cerebellar cortex and, as novel result, we demonstrated a direct route linking the dentate nucleus to the internal globus pallidus as well as to the substantia nigra. These findings may open a new scenario on the interpretation of basal ganglia disorders.

Indexed as

basal gangliacerebellumconnectivityCSDtractography

Identifiers

PMID27047348
PMCPMC4796021
OpenAlexW2327089815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.