Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2016

Cerebellar Nuclei Neurons Show Only Small Excitatory Responses to Optogenetic Olivary Stimulation in Transgenic Mice: In Vivo and In Vitro Studies.

Huo Lu, Bo Yang, Dieter Jaeger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Developmentally Unique Cerebellar Processing Prioritizes Self- over Other-Generated Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huo LuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine-Georgia CampusSuwannee, GA, USA; Department of Biology, Emory UniversityAtlanta, GA, USA.
Bo YangDepartment of Biology, Emory University Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dieter JaegerDepartment of Biology, Emory University Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Optogenetic investigation of olivary inputs to the deep cerebellar nucleiR21NS074296 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JAEGER, DIETER · 2011 to 2012
$429k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS074296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the olivary input to the cerebellar nuclei (CN) we used optogenetic stimulation in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) in olivary neurons. We obtained in vivo extracellular Purkinje cell (PC) and CN recordings in anesthetized mice while stimulating the contralateral inferior olive (IO) with a blue laser (single pulse, 10-50 ms duration). Peri-stimulus histograms (PSTHs) were constructed to show the spike rate changes after optical stimulation. Among 29 CN neurons recorded, 15 showed a decrease in spike rate of variable strength and duration, and only 1 showed a transient spiking response. These results suggest that direct olivary input to CN neurons is usually overridden by stronger PC inhibition triggered by climbing fiber responses. To further investigate the direct input from the climbing fiber collaterals we also conducted whole cell recordings in brain slices, where we used local stimulation with blue light. Due to the expression of ChR2 in PC axons as well as the IO in our transgenic line, strong inhibitory responses could be readily triggered with optical stimulation (13 of 15 neurons). After blocking this inhibition with GABAzine, only in 5 of 13 CN neurons weak excitatory responses were revealed. Therefore our in vitro results support the in vivo findings that the excitatory input to CN neurons from climbing fiber collaterals in adult mice is masked by the inhibition under normal conditions.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCerebellar NucleiChannelrhodopsinsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsIn Vitro TechniquesLuminescent ProteinsMaleMiceMice, TransgenicNerve FibersNeuronsOlivary NucleusOptogeneticsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhotic StimulationChannelrhodopsinsLuminescent ProteinsPlant Lectinstomato lectintranscription factor PTF1Transcription Factorsclimbing fiber collateralsinferior oliveoptogeneticssingle unitslice

Identifiers

PMID27047344
PMCPMC4805604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.