Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047330›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Discerning Neurogenic vs. Non-Neurogenic Postnatal Lateral Ventricular Astrocytes via Activity-Dependent Input.

Elena W Adlaf, Aaron Mitchell-Dick, Chay T Kuo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena W AdlafDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine Durham, NC, USA.
Aaron Mitchell-DickDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurham, NC, USA; Cellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Training Program, Duke University School of MedicineDurham, NC, USA.
Chay T KuoDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurham, NC, USA; Cellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Training Program, Duke University School of MedicineDurham, NC, USA; Brumley Neonatal Perinatal Research Institute, Duke University School of MedicineDurham, NC, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurham, NC, USA; Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of MedicineDurham, NC, USA; Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke UniversityDurham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS OF CELLULAR STRUCTUREST32GM007184 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1985 to 2019
$18.2M
Neural Circuit Control of Postnatal Quiescent Neural Stem Cell ActivationR01MH105416 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YIN, HENRY · 2015 to 2024
$4.6M
Molecular control of ependymal cell plasticity and its contribution to new neuron production in the mammalian brainR01NS078192 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KUO, CHAY TITUS · 2012 to 2020
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007184NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105416NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout development, neural stem cells (NSCs) give rise to differentiated neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes which together modulate perception, memory, and behavior in the adult nervous system. To understand how NSCs contribute to postnatal/adult brain remodeling and repair after injury, the lateral ventricular (LV) neurogenic niche in the rodent postnatal brain serves as an excellent model system. It is a specialized area containing self-renewing GFAP(+) astrocytes functioning as NSCs generating new neurons throughout life. In addition to this now well-studied regenerative process, the LV niche also generates differentiated astrocytes, playing an important role for glial scar formation after cortical injury. While LV NSCs can be clearly distinguished from their neuroblast and oligodendrocyte progeny via molecular markers, the astrocytic identity of NSCs has complicated their distinction from terminally-differentiated astrocytes in the niche. Our current models of postnatal/adult LV neurogenesis do not take into account local astrogenesis, or the possibility that cellular markers may be similar between non-dividing GFAP(+) NSCs and their differentiated astrocyte daughters. Postnatal LV neurogenesis is regulated by NSC-intrinsic mechanisms interacting with extracellular/niche-driven cues. It is generally believed that these local effects are responsible for sustaining neurogenesis, though behavioral paradigms and disease states have suggested possibilities for neural circuit-level modulation. With recent experimental findings that neuronal stimulation can directly evoke responses in LV NSCs, it is possible that this exciting property will add a new dimension to identifying postnatal/adult NSCs. Here, we put forth a notion that neural circuit-level input can be a distinct characteristic defining postnatal/adult NSCs from non-neurogenic astroglia.

Indexed as

adult neurogenesisastrogenesischolinergic circuitlateral ventriclesneural stem cells (NSCs)

Identifiers

PMID27047330
PMCPMC4805585
OpenAlexW2319262014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.