Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27047131›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2015

Prevalence of classical swine fever in Karnataka, India.

Prakash Choori, S S Patil, D Rathnamma, R Sharada, B M Chandranaik, S Isloor, G B Manjunath Reddy, S Geetha, H Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Spatial seroprevalence of classical swine fever in India.Tropical animal health and production · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Prakash ChooriDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
S S PatilDepartment of Virology, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics (Formerly PD_ADMAS), Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
D RathnammaDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
R SharadaDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
B M ChandranaikDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
S IsloorDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
G B Manjunath ReddyDepartment of Virology, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics (Formerly PD_ADMAS), Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
S GeethaDepartment of Virology, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics (Formerly PD_ADMAS), Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
H RahmanDepartment of Virology, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics (Formerly PD_ADMAS), Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Karnataka Veterinary Animal and Fisheries Sciences University · INNational Institute Of Veterinary Epidemiology And Disease Informatics · INInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe present study was conducted to know the current scenario of classical swine fever (CSF) in Bengaluru Urban, Bengaluru Rural, Chikkaballapur, Madikeri, Mandya, Bagalkot, Gadag, Yadgir, Koppal, and Bidar districts of Karnataka with the using of both antigen and antibody ELISA. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected 218 sera and 121 blood samples from pigs from 10 different districts of Karnataka. Screening of sera for CSF IgG antibody and whole blood for CSF virus antigen were carried out using the CSF virus (CSFV) antibody and antigen ELISA kits, respectively.

resultsThe mean seroprevalence was 41% (89/218) and prevalence of CSFV antigen in blood samples was 32% (39/121) for the 10 districts of Karnataka. Seroprevalence of 61%, 29%, 20%, and 21%; and antigen prevalence of 40%, 50%, 13%, and 12% were recorded for Bangalore, Mysore, Belgaum, and Gulbarga divisions of Karnataka, respectively.

conclusionsThe study revealed an alarmingly high prevalence of CSF, both for the antigen (32%) and antibody (41%) in Karnataka. Southern Karnataka has the highest seroprevalence (61% in Bangalore and 29% in Mysore divisions), which confirms the endemicity of the disease in that region. This could be attributed to the intensive pig farming practices in the region as compared to Northern Karnataka (Seroprevalence of 20% in Belgaum and 21% in Gulbarga divisions), where the commercial pig farming is still in infantile stages.

Indexed as

antibodyantigenclassical swine feverELISA and prevalence

Identifiers

PMID27047131
PMCPMC4774808
OpenAlexW2041310428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.