Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27046986›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2015

Prevalence of Campylobacter species in milk and milk products, their virulence gene profile and anti-bio gram.

Shivani Modi, M N Brahmbhatt, Y A Chatur, J B Nayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Molecular Detection of Virulence-Associated Markers inBioMed research international · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Isolation, biotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility ofItalian journal of food safety · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shivani ModiDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
M N BrahmbhattDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Y A ChaturDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
J B NayakDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDuring the last decades, number of food poisoning cases due to Campylobacter occurred, immensely. After poultry, raw milk acts as a second main source of Campylobacter. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to detect the prevalence of Campylobacters in milk and milk products and to know the antibiotic sensitivity and virulence gene profile of Campylobacter spp. in Anand city, Gujarat, India. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 240 samples (85 buffalo milk, 65 cow milk, 30 cheese, 30 ice-cream and 30 paneer) were collected from the different collection points in Anand city. The samples were processed by microbiological culture method, and presumptive isolates were further confirmed by genus and species-specific polymerase chain reaction using previously reported primer. The isolates were further subjected to antibiotic susceptibility assay and virulence gene detection.

resultCampylobacter species were detected in 7 (2.91%) raw milk samples whereas none of the milk product was positive. All the isolate identified were Campylobacter jejuni. Most of the isolates showed resistance against nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and tetracyclin. All the isolates have three virulence genes cadF, cdtB and flgR whereas only one isolate was positive for iamA gene and 6 isolates were positive for fla gene.

conclusionThe presence of Campylobacter in raw milk indicates that raw milk consumption is hazardous for human being and proper pasteurization of milk and adaptation of hygienic condition will be necessary to protect the consumer from this zoonotic pathogen.

Indexed as

antibiotic susceptibilityCampylobacter jejunipolymerase chain reactionvirulence gene

Identifiers

PMID27046986
PMCPMC4777796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.