Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27046504›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2016

Comparison of nicotine dependence indicators in predicting quitting among pregnant smokers.

Allison N Kurti, Danielle R Davis, Joan M Skelly, Ryan Redner, Stephen T Higgins

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison N KurtiDepartment of Psychiatry.
Danielle R DavisDepartment of Psychiatry.
Joan M SkellyDepartment of Medical Biostatistics.
Ryan RednerDepartment of Psychiatry.
Stephen T HigginsDepartment of Psychiatry.

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
TRAINING IN BEHAV. PHARMACOLOGY OF HUMAN DRUG DEPENDENCET32DA007242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H, HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1990 to 2025
$8.2M
Voucher-based incentives to treat pregnant smokersR01DA014028 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2001 to 2010
$6.0M
Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Disadvantaged Pregnant WomenR01HD075669 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075669NICHD NIH HHS R01HD075669NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014028NIDA NIH HHS R01DA14028NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007242NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in the general population of smokers indicates that across various measures of nicotine dependence, time to first cigarette (TTFC) is the strongest single-item predictor of quitting success. Whether those findings generalize to pregnant smokers is unclear. To investigate this matter, we compared TTFC with cigarettes per day (CPD) and the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI; Kozlowski, Porter, Orleans, Pope, & Heatherton, 1994) in predicting late-pregnancy abstinence among 289 pregnant women enrolled in 4 smoking-cessation trials assessing the efficacy of financial incentives. Logistic regression was used to compare predictors, with model fit measured using the c statistic (range = 0.5, poor prediction to 1.0, perfect prediction). In simple regressions, model fit was comparable across the 3 measures although strongest for CPD alone (c = 0.70, 0.68, 0.66 for CPD, HSI, and TTFC, respectively). In a stepwise multiple regression, treatment was entered first (c = 0.67), then CPD (c = 0.77), quit attempts prepregnancy (c = .81), TTFC (c = .82), and quit attempts during pregnancy (c = .83). We saw no evidence supporting TTFC as the optimal predictor of quitting among pregnant smokers. Instead, the evidence supported using CPD and TTFC together or CPD alone if using only a single predictor.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMotivationPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmokingSmoking CessationTime FactorsTobacco Use DisorderYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27046504
PMCPMC4822339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.