Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27045454›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2016

Diagnostic performance of influenza viruses and RSV rapid antigen detection tests in children in tertiary care.

F M Moesker, J J A van Kampen, G Aron, M Schutten, D A M C van de Vijver, M P G Koopmans, A D M E Osterhaus, P L A Fraaij

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid immunoassay for diagnosis of COVID-19 in the emergency department.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Review
  11. Pharyngitis: Approach to diagnosis and treatment.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F M MoeskerDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J J A van KampenDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
G AronDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M SchuttenDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Viroclinics Biosciences BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
D A M C van de VijverDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M P G KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A D M E OsterhausDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Viroclinics Biosciences BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Research Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses (RIZ), University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Albert.Osterhaus@tiho-hannover.de.
P L A FraaijDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLViroclinics Biosciences (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) are increasingly used to detect influenza viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). However, their sensitivity and specificity are a matter of debate, challenging their clinical usefulness.

objectivesComparing diagnostic performances of BinaxNow Influenza AB(®) (BNI) and BinaxNow RSV(®) (BNR), to those of real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), virus isolation and direct immunofluorescence (D-IF) in paediatric patients. STUDY

designBetween November 2005 and September 2013, 521 nasal washings from symptomatic children (age <5 years) attending our tertiary care centre were tested, with a combination of the respective assays using RT-PCR as gold standard.

resultsSensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of BNI were 69% (confidence interval [CI] [51-83]), 96% [94-97], 55% [39-70] and 98% [96-99] respectively. Of eleven false-negative samples, RT-PCR Ct-values were higher than all RT-PCR positive test results (27 vs 22, p=0.012). Of twenty false-positive samples, none were culture positive and two tested positive in D-IF. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for BNR were 79% [73-85], 98% [96-99], 97% [93-99] and 88% [84-91]. Of the 42 false-negative samples the median Ct-value was higher than that of all RT-PCR positive samples (31 vs 23, p<0.0001). Five false-positive samples were detected. Three of these tested positive for RSV in virus isolation and D-IF.

conclusionsRADTs have a high specificity with BNR being superior to BNI. However, their relative low sensitivity limits their usefulness for clinical decision making in a tertiary care paediatric hospital.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralChild, PreschoolDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanMaleOrthomyxoviridaePredictive Value of TestsRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificityTertiary Health CareTime FactorsAntigens, ViralInfluenzaPaediatricsRapid antigen detection testsRespiratory syncytial virusTertiary care

Identifiers

PMID27045454
PMCPMC7185377
OpenAlexW2304909559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.