ArticleAIDS (London, England)2016
Sexual behaviour among people with HIV according to self-reported antiretroviral treatment and viral load status.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brief Report: Accuracy in Self-Report of Viral Suppression Among HIV-Positive Men With HIV-Negative Male Partners.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020Trial
- Impact of early antiretroviral treatment on sexual behaviour: a randomised comparison.AIDS (London, England) · 2019Trial
- HIV-serodifferent couples' perspectives and practices regarding HIV prevention strategies: A mixed methods study.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Accuracy of Self-Reports of HIV Viral Load Status and Risk Factors for Inaccurate Reporting of Viral Suppression Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Persons Living with HIV.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2020Article
- Quantifying the reduction in sexual transmission of HIV-1 among MSM by early initiation of ART: A mathematical model.PloS one · 2020Article
- Inconsistent condom use between serodifferent sexual partnerships to the human immunodeficiency virus.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2019Article
- Condomless sex in HIV-diagnosed men who have sex with men in the UK: prevalence, correlates, and implications for HIV transmission.Sexually transmitted infections · 2017Article
- Accuracy of self-report of HIV viral load among people with HIV on antiretroviral treatment.HIV medicine · 2017Article
- The Use of Intervention Mapping to Develop a Tailored Web-Based Intervention, Condom-HIM.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2017Article
- When "Chems" Meet Sex: A Rising Phenomenon Called "ChemSex".Current neuropharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess, among people with HIV, the association of self-reported antiretroviral treatment (ART) and viral load status with condomless sex with an HIV-serodifferent partner (CLS-D).
designCross-sectional study of 3258 HIV-diagnosed adults in the United Kingdom, 2011-2012.
methodsCLS-D in the past 3 months and self-reported ART/viral load were ascertained by questionnaire. Clinic-recorded viral load was documented. HIV-transmission risk sex (CLS-D-HIV-risk) was defined as CLS-D together with either not on ART or clinic-recorded viral load more than 50 copies/ml.
resultsOf 3178 participants diagnosed more than 3 months ago, 2746 (87.9%) were on ART, of whom self-reported viral load was '50 copies/ml/ or less/undetectable' for 78.4%; 'more than 50 copies/ml/detectable' for 8.3%; 'do not know/missing' for 13.3%. CLS-D prevalence was 14.9% (326/2189), 6.4% (23/360) and 10.7% (67/629) among men who have sex with men, heterosexual men and women, respectively. Among men who have sex with men, CLS-D prevalence was 18.8% among those not on ART; 15.2% among those on ART with undetectable self-reported viral load; 9.8% among those on ART without undetectable self-reported viral load. Compared with 'on ART with undetectable self-reported viral load', prevalence ratios (95% confidence interval) adjusted for demographic/HIV-related factors were: 0.66 (0.45, 0.95) for 'on ART without undetectable self-reported viral load', and 1.08 (0.78, 1.49) for 'not on ART' (global P = 0.021). Among heterosexual men and women (combined), ART/self-reported viral load was not associated with CLS-D [corresponding adjusted prevalence ratios: 1.14 (0.73, 1.79) for 'on ART without undetectable self-reported viral load'; 0.88 (0.44, 1.77) for 'not on ART', P = 0.77]. CLS-D-HIV-risk prevalence was 3.2% among all participants; 16.1% for 'not on ART'; 0.6% for 'on ART with undetectable self-reported viral load; 4.2% for 'on ART without undetectable self-reported viral load.'
conclusionUse of ART was not associated with increased prevalence of CLS-D, and was associated with greatly reduced prevalence of HIV-transmission risk sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.