Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27045100›Full record

ReviewJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2016

Genetics as a molecular window into recovery, its treatment, and stress responses after stroke.

Vanessa Juth, E Alison Holman, Michelle K Chan, Steven C Cramer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa JuthProgram in Nursing Science, UC Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
E Alison HolmanProgram in Nursing Science, UC Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Michelle K ChanProgram in Nursing Science, UC Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Steven C CramerDepartment of Neurology, UC Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
UC Irvine Health · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001415 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CAIOZZO, VINCENT JAMES, HEAD, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2023
$4.2M
Genetic variation, stress, and functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitationR01NR015591 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CRAMER, STEVEN C., HOLMAN, ELLEN ALISON · 2015 to 2020
$2.6M
Brain plasticity and rehabilitation after strokeK24HD074722 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CRAMER, STEVEN C. · 2013 to 2017
$588k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001415NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD074722NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke remains a major source of adult disability in the USA and worldwide. Most patients show some recovery during the weeks to months following a stroke, but this is generally incomplete. An emerging branch of therapeutics targets the processes underlying this behavioral recovery from stroke toward the goal of reducing long-term disability. A key factor hampering these efforts is the very large degree of variability between stroke survivors. Available data suggest that genetic differences could explain an important fraction of the differences between subjects. The current review considers this from several angles, including genetic differences in relation to drugs that promote recovery. Genetic factors related to physiological and psychological stress responses may also be critically important to understanding recovery after stroke and its treatment. The studies reviewed provide insights into recovery and suggest directions for further research to improve clinical decision-making in this setting. Genetic differences between patients might be used to help clinical trials select specific patient subgroups, on a biological basis, in order to sharpen the precision with which new treatments are evaluated. Pharmacogenomic factors might also provide insights into inter-subject differences in treatment side effects for pharmacological prescriptions, and behavioral interventions, and others. These efforts must be conducted with the strictest ethical standards given the highly sensitive nature of genetic data. Understanding the effect of selected genetic measures could improve a clinician's ability to predict the risk and efficacy of a restorative therapy and to make maximally informed decisions, and in so doing, facilitate individual patient care.

Indexed as

HumansNerve RegenerationPharmacogeneticsStress, PsychologicalStrokeStroke RehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID27045100
PMCPMC4942179
OpenAlexW2341904003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.