Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044972›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2016

Use Of Nursing Home Compare Website Appears Limited By Lack Of Awareness And Initial Mistrust Of The Data.

R Tamara Konetzka, Marcelo Coca Perraillon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Public Reporting and Consumer Demand in the Home Health Sector.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Medicaid and Nursing Home Choice: Why Do Duals End Up in Low-Quality Facilities?Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Consumer Response to Composite Ratings of Nursing Home Quality.American journal of health economics · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R Tamara KonetzkaR. Tamara Konetzka (konetzka@uchicago.edu) is a professor in the Department of Public Health Sciences at the University of Chicago, in Illinois.
Marcelo Coca PerraillonMarcelo Coca Perraillon is an assistant professor in the Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy at the Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, in Aurora.

Funding

Improving Nursing Home Compare for Dually Eligible ConsumersR21HS021877 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KONETZKA, RITA TAMARA · 2012 to 2014
$922k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS021877AHRQ HHS R21HS021877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In December 2008 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) launched a five-star rating system of nursing homes as part of Nursing Home Compare, a web-based report card detailing quality of care at all CMS-certified nursing homes. Questions remain, however, as to how well consumers use this rating system as well as other sources of information in choosing nursing home placement. We used a qualitative assessment of how consumers select nursing homes and of the role of information about quality, using semistructured interviews of people who recently placed a family member or friend in a nursing home. We found that consumers were receptive to using Internet-based information about quality as one source of information but that choice was limited by the need for specialized services, proximity to family or health care providers, and availability of Medicaid beds. Consumers had a positive reaction when shown Nursing Home Compare; however, its use appeared to be limited by lack of awareness and, to some extent, initial lack of trust of the data. Our findings suggest that efforts to expand the use of Nursing Home Compare should focus on awareness and trust. Useful additions to Nursing Home Compare might include measures of the availability of activities, information about cost, and consumer satisfaction.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAwarenessCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Data CollectionFemaleHealth Care SurveysHomes for the AgedHumansInformation DisseminationInternetInterviews as TopicMaleNeeds AssessmentConsumer Issuesnursing homespublic reportingQuality Of Care

Identifiers

PMID27044972
PMCPMC7482192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.