Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044551›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Results from the Solithromycin International Surveillance Program (2014).

David J Farrell, Robert K Flamm, Helio S Sader, Ronald N Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Metabolism, Excretion, and Mass Balance of Solithromycin in Humans.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The macrolide antibiotic renaissance.British journal of pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David J FarrellJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA david-farrell@jmilabs.com.
Robert K FlammJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Helio S SaderJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Ronald N JonesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
JMI Laboratories · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solithromycin, a fourth-generation macrolide (a fluoroketolide with enhanced activity against macrolide-resistant bacteria due to interaction with three ribosomal sites) and the first fluoroketolide, was tested against a 2014 collection of 6,115 isolates, including Streptococcus pneumoniae (1,713 isolates), Haemophilus influenzae (1,308), Moraxella catarrhalis (577), Staphylococcus aureus (1,024), and beta-hemolytic streptococci (1,493), by reference broth microdilution methods. The geographic samples included 2,748 isolates from the United States, 2,536 from Europe, 386 from Latin America, and 445 from the Asia-Pacific region. Solithromycin was observed to be very active against S. pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 0.008/0.12 μg/ml), demonstrating 2-fold greater activity than telithromycin (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.25 μg/ml) and 16- to >256-fold greater activity than azithromycin (MIC50/90, 0.12/>32 μg/ml), with all strains being inhibited at a solithromycin MIC of ≤1 μg/ml. Against H. influenzae, solithromycin showed potency identical to that of telithromycin (MIC50/90, 1/2 μg/ml), and both of these compounds were 2-fold less active than azithromycin (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml). All but one of the M. catarrhalis isolates were inhibited by solithromycin at ≤0.25 μg/ml. Solithromycin inhibited 85.3% of S. aureus isolates at ≤1 μg/ml, and its activity was lower against methicillin-resistant (MIC50/90, 0.06/>32 μg/ml) than against methicillin-susceptible (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 μg/ml) isolates. Little variation in solithromycin activity was observed by geographic region for the species tested. Solithromycin was very active against beta-hemolytic streptococci (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.03 μg/ml), and all isolates were inhibited at MIC values of ≤0.5 μg/ml. In conclusion, solithromycin demonstrated potent activity against global and contemporary (2014) pathogens that represent the major causes of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. These data support the continued clinical development of solithromycin for the treatment of this important indication.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAnti-Bacterial AgentsAsiaAzithromycinBacterial InfectionsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsEuropeHaemophilus influenzaeHumansInternational CooperationKetolidesLatin AmericaMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoraxella catarrhalisStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinKetolidesMacrolidessolithromycintelithromycinTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID27044551
PMCPMC4879362
OpenAlexW2338797951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.