Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044516›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Compensation of Dosage-Sensitive Genes on the Chicken Z Chromosome.

Fabian Zimmer, Peter W Harrison, Christophe Dessimoz, Judith E Mank

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sharks and rays have the oldest vertebrate sex chromosome with unique sex determination mechanisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Are plant and animal sex chromosomes really all that different?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The timing of genetic degeneration of sex chromosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Fabian ZimmerDepartment of Genetics Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom fabian.zimmer.12@ucl.ac.uk.
Peter W HarrisonDepartment of Genetics Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christophe DessimozDepartment of Genetics Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom Department of Ecology and Evolution & Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Biophore 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Biophore, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GB

Funding

European Research Council 260233Medical Research Council G0900747Medical Research Council G0900747 91070Wellcome Trust 090532/Z09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many diploid species, sex determination is linked to a pair of sex chromosomes that evolved from a pair of autosomes. In these organisms, the degeneration of the sex-limited Y or W chromosome causes a reduction in gene dose in the heterogametic sex for X- or Z-linked genes. Variations in gene dose are detrimental for large chromosomal regions when they span dosage-sensitive genes, and many organisms were thought to evolve complete mechanisms of dosage compensation to mitigate this. However, the recent realization that a wide variety of organisms lack complete mechanisms of sex chromosome dosage compensation has presented a perplexing question: How do organisms with incomplete dosage compensation avoid deleterious effects of gene dose differences between the sexes? Here we use expression data from the chicken (Gallus gallus) to show that ohnologs, duplicated genes known to be dosage-sensitive, are preferentially dosage-compensated on the chicken Z chromosome. Our results indicate that even in the absence of a complete and chromosome wide dosage compensation mechanism, dosage-sensitive genes are effectively dosage compensated on the Z chromosome.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticAnimalsChickensFemaleGene DosageGene DuplicationMaleSex ChromosomesSex Determination Processesdosage sensitivityohnologssex chromosomeswhole genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID27044516
PMCPMC4860703
OpenAlexW2341026887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.