Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044484›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal for equity in health2016

Comparative observational study of mortality amenable by health policy and care between rural and urban Finland: no excess segregation of mortality in the capital despite its increasing residential differentiation.

Markku Lehikoinen, Martti Arffman, Kristiina Manderbacka, Marko Elovainio, Ilmo Keskimäki

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal for equity in health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markku LehikoinenDepartment of Social Services and Health Care, City of Helsinki, P.O. Box 6100, 00099, Helsinki, Finland. markku.lehikoinen@helsinki.fi.
Martti ArffmanDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Social and Health Systems Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristiina ManderbackaDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Social and Health Systems Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Marko ElovainioDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Social and Health Systems Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Ilmo KeskimäkiDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Social and Health Systems Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge cities are often claimed to display more distinct geographical and socioeconomic health inequalities than other areas due to increasing residential differentiation. Our aim was to assess whether geographical inequalities in mortality within the capital (City of Helsinki) both exceeded that in other types of geographical areas in Finland, and whether those differences were dependent on socioeconomic inequalities.

methodsWe analysed the inequality of distribution separately for overall, ischemic heart disease and alcohol-related mortality, and mortality amenable (AM) to health care interventions in 1992-2008 in three types of geographical areas in Finland: City of Helsinki, other large cities, and small towns and rural areas. Mortality data were acquired as secondary data from the Causes of Death statistics from Statistics Finland. The assessment of changing geographical differences over time, that is geographical inequalities, was performed using Gini coefficients. As some of these differences might arise from socioeconomic factors, we assessed socioeconomic differences with concentration indices in parallel to an analysis of geographical differences. To conclude the analysis, we compared the changes over time of these inequalities between the three geographical areas.

resultsWhile mortality rates mainly decreased, alcohol-related mortality in the lowest income quintile increased. Statistically significant differences over time were found in all mortality groups, varying between geographical areas. Socioeconomic differences existed in all mortality groups and geographical areas. In the study period, geographical differences in mortality remained relatively stable but income differences increased substantially. For instance, the values of concentration indices for AM changed by 54 % in men (p < 0.027) and by 62 % in women (p < 0.016). Only slight differences existed in the time trends of Gini or in the concentration indices between the geographical areas.

conclusionsNo geographical or income-related differences in the distribution of mortality existed between Helsinki and other urban or rural areas of Finland. This suggests that the effect of increasing residential differentiation in the capital may have been mitigated by the policies of positive discrimination and social mixing. One of the main reasons for the increase in health inequalities was growth of alcohol-related mortality, especially among those with the lowest incomes.

Indexed as

MortalityAdultAgedAlcohol-Related DisordersFemaleFinlandHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsUrban PopulationHealth inequalitiesPositive discriminationRegister dataResidential differentiationSocial mixing

Identifiers

PMID27044484
PMCPMC4820906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.