Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044480›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2016

Safety of fentanyl initiation according to past opioid exposure among patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches.

Kevin J Friesen, Cornelius Woelk, Shawn Bugden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Trends in opioid prescribing in Estonia (2011-2017).Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. National opioid crisis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Article
  9. Consequences of unsafe prescribing of transdermal fentanyl.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin J FriesenCollege of Pharmacy (Friesen, Bugden) Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Department of Family Medicine (Woelk), College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Cornelius WoelkCollege of Pharmacy (Friesen, Bugden) Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Department of Family Medicine (Woelk), College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Shawn BugdenCollege of Pharmacy (Friesen, Bugden) Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Department of Family Medicine (Woelk), College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. shawn.bugden@umanitoba.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough a convenient opioid delivery system, transdermal fentanyl patches have caused several deaths and resulted in safety warnings reminding prescribers that fentanyl patches should be prescribed only for patients who have adequate prior exposure to opioids. We conducted a longitudinal analysis of the safety of fentanyl initiation by examining past opioid exposure among patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches.

methodsWe identified all patients in the province of Manitoba who were newly prescribed fentanyl patches between Apr. 1, 2001, and Mar. 31, 2013. We converted all prior opioid use to oral morphine equivalents and determined the average daily dose in the 7-30 days before initial fentanyl patch use. Fentanyl initiation was considered unsafe if the patient's pre-fentanyl opioid exposure was below the recommended level.

resultsWe identified 11 063 patients who began using fentanyl patches during the study period. Overall, fentanyl initiation was deemed unsafe in 74.1% of cases because the patient's prior opioid exposure was inadequate. Women and patients 65 years of age and older were more likely than men and younger patients, respectively, to have inadequate prior opioid exposure (p < 0.001 for each comparison). The proportion of patients who had unsafe prescriptions for fentanyl patches decreased significantly over the study period, from 87.0% in 2001 to 50.0% in 2012 (p < 0.001).

interpretationThe safety of fentanyl initiation improved over the study period, but still half of fentanyl patch prescriptions were written for patients with inadequate prior opioid exposure. Review of prior opioid exposure may be a simple but important way to improve the safe use of fentanyl patches.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleFentanylHumansMaleManitobaMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient SafetyAnalgesics, OpioidFentanyl

Identifiers

PMID27044480
PMCPMC4902689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.