Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044415›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

Epidemiology and public health significance of Cryptosporidium isolated from cattle, buffaloes, and humans in Egypt.

M A Ibrahim, A E Abdel-Ghany, G K Abdel-Latef, S A Abdel-Aziz, S M Aboelhadid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. First report ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  16. First Molecular Genotyping ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M A IbrahimHygiene, Management and Zoonoses Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, 62511, Beni-Suef, Egypt. mohamed_1400@hotmail.com.
A E Abdel-GhanyHygiene and Zoonoses Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alminia University, Minya, Egypt.
G K Abdel-LatefHygiene, Management and Zoonoses Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, 62511, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
S A Abdel-AzizHygiene, Management and Zoonoses Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, 62511, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
S M AboelhadidParasitology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Beni-Suef University · EGMinia University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemiology and public health significance of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes were investigated in Beni-Suef Governorate, Egypt. A total of 610 animal fecal samples (480 from cattle and 130 from buffaloes) beside 290 stool samples from humans were collected in the period between January and December 2014. Based on the microscopic examination, the overall estimated prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle, buffaloes, and humans was 10.2, 12.3, and 19 %, respectively. The highest detection rates were in calves less than 2 months of age (17.1 %) and diarrheic animals (13.0 %). Likewise in humans, the highest prevalence of Cryptosporidium was in infants (31.3 %) and diarrheic individuals (21.1 %). The gender distribution in humans denoted that Cryptosporidium was reported more frequently in males (21.7 %) than females (14.5 %). Based on the molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium, Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP) and gp60 genes were successfully amplified in 36 out of 50 samples subjected to genotyping. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the COWP fragments revealed that Cryptosporidium parvum was the only species detected in cattle (12 isolates) and buffaloes (4 isolates), while in humans, the detected species were Cryptosporidium hominis (15 isolates) and C. parvum (5 isolates). Sequence analysis of the gp60 gene identified the subtype IIdA20G1 within C. parvum isolated from both animals and humans. The common occurrence of zoonotic subtypes of C. parvum in cattle and buffaloes highlights the potential role of these animals as significant reservoirs of infection to humans. Also, the presence of C. hominis and C. parvum in humans indicates that both anthroponotic and zoonotic pathways are expected.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsBuffaloesCattleCattle DiseasesCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium parvumEgyptFecesFemaleGenotypeHumansInfantMaleMicroscopyPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthAdjuvants, Immunologicoocyst wall protein, CryptosporidiumProtozoan Proteinssialoglycoprotein gp60SialoglycoproteinsAnimalsCryptosporidiumEgyptGp60HumansPCR-RFLP

Identifiers

PMID27044415
OpenAlexW2338500493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.