Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044370›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2016

Monitoring Quality of Biotherapeutic Products Using Multivariate Data Analysis.

Anurag S Rathore, Mili Pathak, Renu Jain, Gaurav Pratap Singh Jadaun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anurag S RathoreDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India. asrathore@biotechcmz.com.
Mili PathakDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Renu JainNational Institute of Biologicals, Noida, India.
Gaurav Pratap Singh JadaunNational Institute of Biologicals, Noida, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the quality of pharmaceutical products is a global challenge, heightened by the implications of letting subquality drugs come to the market on public safety. Regulatory agencies do their due diligence at the time of approval as per their prescribed regulations. However, product quality needs to be monitored post-approval as well to ensure patient safety throughout the product life cycle. This is particularly complicated for biotechnology-based therapeutics where seemingly minor changes in process and/or raw material attributes have been shown to have a significant effect on clinical safety and efficacy of the product. This article provides a perspective on the topic of monitoring the quality of biotech therapeutics. In the backdrop of challenges faced by the regulatory agencies, the potential use of multivariate data analysis as a tool for effective monitoring has been proposed. Case studies using data from several insulin biosimilars have been used to illustrate the key concepts.

Indexed as

Multivariate AnalysisAnimalsBiological ProductsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug IndustryHumansQuality ControlBiological ProductsBiosimilar Pharmaceuticalsbiosimilarsmultivariate data analysisprocess monitoringproduct qualityquality by design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.