Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044263›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

In vitro and in vivo activity of melflufen (J1)in lymphoma.

Maryam Delforoush, Sara Strese, Malin Wickström, Rolf Larsson, Gunilla Enblad, Joachim Gullbo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam DelforoushDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sara StreseDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Malin WickströmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rolf LarssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gunilla EnbladDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden.
Joachim GullboDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden. Joachim.Gullbo@medsci.uu.se.
Uppsala University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelphalan has been used in the treatment of various hematologic malignancies for almost 60 years. Today it is part of standard therapy for multiple myeloma and also as part of myeloablative regimens in association with autologous allogenic stem cell transplantation. Melflufen (melphalan flufenamide ethyl ester, previously called J1) is an optimized derivative of melphalan providing targeted delivery of active metabolites to cells expressing aminopeptidases. The activity of melflufen has compared favorably with that of melphalan in a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments performed preferentially on different solid tumor models and multiple myeloma. Melflufen is currently being evaluated in a clinical phase I/II trial in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

methodsCytotoxicity of melflufen was assayed in lymphoma cell lines and in primary tumor cells with the Fluorometric Microculture Cytotoxicity Assay and cell cycle analyses was performed in two of the cell lines. Melflufen was also investigated in a xenograft model with subcutaneous lymphoma cells inoculated in mice.

resultsMelflufen showed activity with cytotoxic IC50-values in the submicromolar range (0.011-0.92 μM) in the cell lines, corresponding to a mean of 49-fold superiority (p < 0.001) in potency vs. melphalan. In the primary cultures melflufen yielded slightly lower IC50-values (2.7 nM to 0.55 μM) and an increased ratio vs. melphalan (range 13-455, average 108, p < 0.001). Treated cell lines exhibited a clear accumulation in the G2/M-phase of the cell cycle. Melflufen also showed significant activity and no, or minimal side effects in the xenografted animals.

conclusionThis study confirms previous reports of a targeting related potency superiority of melflufen compared to that of melphalan. Melflufen was active in cell lines and primary cultures of lymphoma cells, as well as in a xenograft model in mice and appears to be a candidate for further evaluation in the treatment of this group of malignant diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansLymphomaMelphalanMiceMultiple MyelomaPhenylalanineXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysmelflufenMelphalanPhenylalanineAlkylating agentsCancer therapeuticsJ1MelflufenProdrug

Identifiers

PMID27044263
PMCPMC4820867
OpenAlexW1950479217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.