Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27044088›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Insight into GATA1 transcriptional activity through interrogation of cis elements disrupted in human erythroid disorders.

Aoi Wakabayashi, Jacob C Ulirsch, Leif S Ludwig, Claudia Fiorini, Makiko Yasuda, Avik Choudhuri, Patrick McDonel, Leonard I Zon, Vijay G Sankaran

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distinguishing causal from tagging enhancers using single-cell multiome data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aoi WakabayashiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 02115; The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142;
Jacob C UlirschDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 02115; The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142;
Leif S LudwigDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 02115; The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142; Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
Claudia FioriniDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 02115; The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142;
Makiko YasudaDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029;
Avik ChoudhuriDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 02115; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
Patrick McDonelThe Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142;
Leonard I ZonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 02115; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
Vijay G SankaranDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 02115; The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142; sankaran@broadinstitute.org.
Boston Children's Hospital · USBroad Institute · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Systematic Genetic Dissection of Human ErythropoiesisR01DK103794 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Vijay Ganesh Sankaran · 2014 to 2026
$5.9M
Project-002U54DK110805 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ORKIN, STUART H, ZON, LEONARD IRA · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
EMBRYONIC HEMATOPOIESISR01HL048801 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI ZON, LEONARD IRA · 1992 to 2016
$5.7M
Identifying Genome-wide Association Study-Nominated Regulators of ErythropoiesisR21HL120791 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SANKARAN, VIJAY GANESH · 2014 to 2015
$477k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL048801NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL120791NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103794NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK110805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-exome sequencing has been incredibly successful in identifying causal genetic variants and has revealed a number of novel genes associated with blood and other diseases. One limitation of this approach is that it overlooks mutations in noncoding regulatory elements. Furthermore, the mechanisms by which mutations in transcriptionalcis-regulatory elements result in disease remain poorly understood. Here we used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to interrogate three such elements harboring mutations in human erythroid disorders, which in all cases are predicted to disrupt a canonical binding motif for the hematopoietic transcription factor GATA1. Deletions of as few as two to four nucleotides resulted in a substantial decrease (>80%) in target gene expression. Isolated deletions of the canonical GATA1 binding motif completely abrogated binding of the cofactor TAL1, which binds to a separate motif. Having verified the functionality of these three GATA1 motifs, we demonstrate strong evolutionary conservation of GATA1 motifs in regulatory elements proximal to other genes implicated in erythroid disorders, and show that targeted disruption of such elements results in altered gene expression. By modeling transcription factor binding patterns, we show that multiple transcription factors are associated with erythroid gene expression, and have created predictive maps modeling putative disruptions of their binding sites at key regulatory elements. Our study provides insight into GATA1 transcriptional activity and may prove a useful resource for investigating the pathogenicity of noncoding variants in human erythroid disorders.

Indexed as

MutationResponse ElementsTranscription, GeneticAnemia, Diamond-BlackfanBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGATA1 Transcription FactorHumansK562 CellsNucleotide MotifsProto-Oncogene ProteinsT-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Protein 1Basic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsGATA1 protein, humanGATA1 Transcription FactorProto-Oncogene ProteinsTAL1 protein, humanT-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Protein 1cis-regulatory elementsGATA1Mendelian erythroid disordersnoncoding mutations

Identifiers

PMID27044088
PMCPMC4843446
OpenAlexW2325099115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.