ArticlePloS one2016
Pharmacists' Perceptions of the Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicators.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical pharmacy key performance indicators for hospital inpatient setting: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Pooled it
- Bridging the gap between theory and practice: clinical pharmacists' perspectives on pharmacokinetics in Sudan.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Retail pharmacy as a career: attitude and perception of pharmacy students, a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Performance, interpersonal relationships and professional satisfaction: determinants to support pharmaceutical reengineering.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Key performance indicators for pharmaceutical services: A systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Review
- Defining quality indicators, pharmaceutical care bundles and outcomes of clinical pharmacy service delivery using a Delphi consensus approach.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- Piloting a Hospital Pharmacy Performance Model in the Face of Province-Wide Implementation of Activity-Based Funding in Quebec Health Care Centres.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2024Article
- Benchmarking hospital clinical pharmacy practice using standardised key performance indicators (KPIs).Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- Potential roles of pharmacists in HIV/AIDS care delivery in Nepal: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Pharmacist's time spent: Space for Pharmacy-based Interventions and Consultation TimE (SPICE)-an observational time and motion study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Pharmacist-led interventions during transitions of care of older adults admitted to short term geriatric units: Current practices and perceived barriers.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Barriers and Facilitators Related to Delivery of Hospital Pharmacy Services to Women, Children, and Their Families during a Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2022Article
- Article
- Defining clinical pharmacy and support activities indicators for hospital practice using a combined nominal and focus group technique.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Quantifying Clinical Pharmacist Activities in a Tertiary Care Hospital Using Key Performance Indicators.Hospital pharmacy · 2021Article
- Assessment of Canadian Hospital Pharmacists' Job Satisfaction and Impact of Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicators.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2021Article
- Quality Indicators of Pharmaceutical Care for Integrative Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Indicators Developed Using the Delphi Technique.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- Optimizing Patient Education of Oncology Medications: A Patient Perspective.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019Article
- How do pharmacists in English general practices identify their impact? An exploratory qualitative study of measurement problems.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Identification of variables influencing pharmaceutical interventions to improve medication review efficiency.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn hospitals around the world, there has been no consensus regarding which clinical activities a pharmacist should focus on until recently. In 2011, a Canadian clinical pharmacy key performance indicator (cpKPI) collaborative was formed. The goal of the collaborative was to advance pharmacy practice in order to improve patient outcomes and enhance the quality of care provided to patients by hospital pharmacists. Following a literature review, which indicated that pharmacists can improve patient outcomes by carrying out specific activities, and an evidence-informed consensus process, a final set of eight cpKPIs were established. Canadian hospitals leading the cpKPI initiative are currently in the early stages of implementing these indicators.
objectiveTo explore pharmacists' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of cpKPIs.
methodsClinical pharmacists employed by the Nova Scotia Health Authority were invited to participate in focus groups. Focus group discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and data was analyzed using thematic analysis.
findingsThree focus groups, including 26 pharmacists, were conducted in February 2015. Three major themes were identified. Resisting the change was comprised of documentation challenges, increased workload, practice environment constraints, and competing priorities. Embracing cpKPIs was composed of seeing the benefit, demonstrating value, and existing supports. Navigating the unknown was made up of quality versus quantity battle, and insights into the future.
conclusionsAlthough pharmacists were challenged by documentation and other changes associated with the implementation of cpKPIs, they demonstrated significant support for cpKPIs and were able to see benefits of the implementation. Pharmacists came up with suggestions for overcoming resistance associated with the implementation of cpKPIs and provided insights into the future of pharmacy practice. The identification of barriers and facilitators to cpKPI implementation will be used to inform the implementation process on a local and national level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.