Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27043667›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2016

Effect of Icodextrin Solution on the Preservation of Residual Renal Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Tae Ik Chang, Dong-Ryeol Ryu, Tae-Hyun Yoo, Hyung Jong Kim, Ea Wha Kang, Hyunwook Kim, Jae Hyun Chang, Dong Ki Kim, Sung Jin Moon, Soo Young Yoon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Tae Ik ChangFrom the Department of Internal Medicine, NHIS Medical Center, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do (TIC, EWK); Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University (D-RR); Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul (T-HY, SHH); Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si (HJK); Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine Sanbon Hospital, Gunpo-si, Gyeonggi-do (HWK); Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon (JHC); Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul (DKK); and Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, Korea (SJM, SYY).
Dong-Ryeol Ryu
Tae-Hyun Yoo
Hyung Jong Kim
Ea Wha Kang
Hyunwook Kim
Jae Hyun Chang
Dong Ki Kim
Sung Jin Moon
Soo Young Yoon
Seung Hyeok Han
Yonsei Associate Network CHronic Kidney Disease Trial (YACHT) investigators
RR Donnelley (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although icodextrin solution has been highlighted in the fluid management compared to glucose-based solutions, proof of a beneficial effect of icodextrin solution on residual renal function (RRF) is lacking. We conducted a multicenter prospective randomized controlled open-label trial to investigate whether icodextrin solution can preserve RRF.One hundred patients with urine volume ≥750 mL/day from 8 centers in Korea were randomly assigned to receive 1 exchange of icodextrin solution for a ≥8 hour-dwell time and 2 exchanges of 1.5% glucose-based biocompatible neutral pH solution or 1 exchange of ≥2.5% and 2 exchanges of 1.5% glucose-based biocompatible solutions. Using mixed-effects general linear models, we analyzed changes in residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and daily urine volume at 1 year.Forty-nine patients were assigned to the icodextrin group and 51 to the glucose solution group. During follow-up, the slope of the decline in residual GFR was -0.170 mL/min/month/1.73 m² in the icodextrin group, while it was -0.155 mL/min/month/1.73 m² in the glucose solution group (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.06 to 0.10; P = 0.701). Daily urine volume decreased faster in the glucose solution group than in the icodextrin group (-31.02 vs -11.88 mL per month; 95% CI, -35.85 to -2.44; P = 0.025). Results were consistent when we analyzed using intention-to-treat and per protocol principles. There were no differences in fluid status, peritoneal ultrafiltration, and peritoneal transport between groups during follow-up.This study clearly showed that icodextrin solution preserves residual urine volume better than glucose solution.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateGlucansGlucoseHumansIcodextrinKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal DialysisProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaGlucansGlucoseIcodextrin

Identifiers

PMID27043667
PMCPMC4998528
OpenAlexW2344479062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.