Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27043416›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2016

Prenatal Education of Parents About Newborn Screening and Residual Dried Blood Spots: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jeffrey R Botkin, Erin Rothwell, Rebecca A Anderson, Nancy C Rose, Siobhan M Dolan, Miriam Kuppermann, Louisa A Stark, Aaron Goldenberg, Bob Wong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02676245 (Parent Education and Choice About Newborn Screening and Bloodspot Retention), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02676245 nacompletednot on this map

Parent Education and Choice About Newborn Screening and Bloodspot Retention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2013 to 2014Enrolled664ConditionsNeonatal ScreeningArmsViewing Newborn Screening movie, Viewing Residual Dried Blood Spot movie
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Current Status of Newborn Screening in Southeastern and Central Europe.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Newborn Screening Is on a Collision Course with Public Health Ethics.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Informing Parents about Newborn Screening: A European Comparison Study.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R BotkinUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Erin RothwellUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Rebecca A AndersonUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Nancy C RoseUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City2Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Siobhan M DolanAlbert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Miriam KuppermannUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Louisa A StarkUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Aaron GoldenbergCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Bob WongUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City.
University of Utah · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Parent Education about Newborn Screening and Bloodspot RetentionR01HG006266 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BOTKIN, JEFFREY R. · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceResearch clearly indicates that current approaches to newborn blood spot screening (NBS) education are ineffective. Incorporating NBS education into prenatal care is broadly supported by lay and professional opinion.

objectiveTo determine the efficacy and effect of prenatal education about newborn screening and use of residual dried blood spots (DBS) in research on parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA randomized clinical trial of prenatal educational interventions, with outcomes measured by survey at 2 to 4 weeks postpartum. Participants were recruited from obstetric clinics in Salt Lake City, Utah; San Francisco, California; and the Bronx, New York. Eligible women were English- or Spanish-speaking adults and did not have a high-risk pregnancy. A total of 901 women were enrolled. Participants who completed the follow-up survey included 212 women in the usual care group (70% retention), 231 in the NBS group (77% retention), and 221 women in the NBS + DBS group (75% retention). Those who completed the survey were similar across the 3 groups with respect to age, ethnicity, race, education, marital status, income, obstetric history, and language.

interventionsParticipants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups: usual care (n = 305), those viewing an NBS movie and brochure (n = 300), and those viewing both the NBS and DBS movies and brochures (n = 296). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Two to four weeks postpartum, women completed a 91-item survey by telephone, addressing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior with respect to opting out of NBS or DBS for their child.

resultsA total of 901 women (mean age, 31 years) were randomized and 664 completed the follow-up survey. The total correct responses on the knowledge instrument in regard to NBS were 69% in the usual care group, 79% in the NBS group, and 75% in the NBS + DBS group, a significant between-group difference (P < .05). Although all groups showed strong support for NBS, the percentage of women who were "very supportive" was highest in the NBS group (94%), followed by the NBS + DBS group (86%) and was lowest in the usual care group (73%) (P < .001). The interventions were not associated with decisions to decline newborn screening or withdraw residual DBS. Nine women stated that they had declined NBS (all the usual care group; P < .001). With respect to DBS, 5 participants indicated that they contacted the health department to have their child's sample withdrawn after testing: 3 in the NBS + DBS group and 2 in the usual care group (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Educational interventions can be implemented in the prenatal clinic, using multimedia tools and electronic platforms. Prenatal education is effective in increasing postnatal knowledge and support for these programs. These results are relevant to other contexts in which residual clinical specimens and data are used for research purposes. CLINICAL

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02676245.

Indexed as

Dried Blood Spot TestingNeonatal ScreeningAdultChoice BehaviorFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornMothersMotion PicturesObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalPamphletsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrenatal EducationSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID27043416
PMCPMC7755042
OpenAlexW2337499116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.