Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2016
Prenatal Education of Parents About Newborn Screening and Residual Dried Blood Spots: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02676245 (Parent Education and Choice About Newborn Screening and Bloodspot Retention), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Parent Education and Choice About Newborn Screening and Bloodspot Retention
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Influence of Education on Public Trust and Consent Preferences With Residual Newborn Screening Dried Blood spots.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2016Trial
- Maternal concern and refusal toward neonatal heel-prick screening: a cross-sectional survey from Türkiye.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Current Status of Newborn Screening in Southeastern and Central Europe.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- An evaluation of U.S. federal investments in newborn screening: successes, gaps, and future directions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Pregnant women's perceived understanding and antenatal information needs regarding newborn screening for inherited metabolic diseases in southwestern China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A population-representative survey on attitudes toward genomic newborn screening in Germany.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Health education needs of pregnant women regarding newborn inborn errors of metabolism based on a social ecological model: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Psychological Impact of Newborn Screening for 3-Methylcrotonyl-CoA Carboxylase Deficiency: The Parental Experience.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Parents' perspectives on expanded newborn genomic screening in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Maternity Care Providers' Experiences with Providing Information on Newborn Bloodspot Screening During Pregnancy: A Dutch Survey Study.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Parental awareness and perspectives on newborn screening in China: a questionnaire-based study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- One Size Does Not Fit All: A Multifaceted Approach to Educate Families about Newborn Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Identification of maternal attitudes and knowledge about newborn screenings: a Turkey sample.Journal of community genetics · 2023Article
- Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Review
- Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Review
- Newborn Screening Is on a Collision Course with Public Health Ethics.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
- Use of Online Newborn Screening Educational Resources for the Education of Expectant Parents: An Improvement in Equity.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
- When Not to Ask: A Defense of Choice-Masking Nudges in Medical Research.Journal of health care law & policy · 2022Article
- "Being proactive, not reactive": exploring perceptions of genetic testing among White, Latinx, and Pacific Islander Populations.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Informing Parents about Newborn Screening: A European Comparison Study.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceResearch clearly indicates that current approaches to newborn blood spot screening (NBS) education are ineffective. Incorporating NBS education into prenatal care is broadly supported by lay and professional opinion.
objectiveTo determine the efficacy and effect of prenatal education about newborn screening and use of residual dried blood spots (DBS) in research on parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA randomized clinical trial of prenatal educational interventions, with outcomes measured by survey at 2 to 4 weeks postpartum. Participants were recruited from obstetric clinics in Salt Lake City, Utah; San Francisco, California; and the Bronx, New York. Eligible women were English- or Spanish-speaking adults and did not have a high-risk pregnancy. A total of 901 women were enrolled. Participants who completed the follow-up survey included 212 women in the usual care group (70% retention), 231 in the NBS group (77% retention), and 221 women in the NBS + DBS group (75% retention). Those who completed the survey were similar across the 3 groups with respect to age, ethnicity, race, education, marital status, income, obstetric history, and language.
interventionsParticipants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups: usual care (n = 305), those viewing an NBS movie and brochure (n = 300), and those viewing both the NBS and DBS movies and brochures (n = 296). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Two to four weeks postpartum, women completed a 91-item survey by telephone, addressing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior with respect to opting out of NBS or DBS for their child.
resultsA total of 901 women (mean age, 31 years) were randomized and 664 completed the follow-up survey. The total correct responses on the knowledge instrument in regard to NBS were 69% in the usual care group, 79% in the NBS group, and 75% in the NBS + DBS group, a significant between-group difference (P < .05). Although all groups showed strong support for NBS, the percentage of women who were "very supportive" was highest in the NBS group (94%), followed by the NBS + DBS group (86%) and was lowest in the usual care group (73%) (P < .001). The interventions were not associated with decisions to decline newborn screening or withdraw residual DBS. Nine women stated that they had declined NBS (all the usual care group; P < .001). With respect to DBS, 5 participants indicated that they contacted the health department to have their child's sample withdrawn after testing: 3 in the NBS + DBS group and 2 in the usual care group (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Educational interventions can be implemented in the prenatal clinic, using multimedia tools and electronic platforms. Prenatal education is effective in increasing postnatal knowledge and support for these programs. These results are relevant to other contexts in which residual clinical specimens and data are used for research purposes. CLINICAL
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02676245.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.