ArticleJAMA neurology2016
Phenotypic Variability of Childhood Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Burden and social context of caregivers of children and adolescents with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Clinical Development of Therapies for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: Recommendations for Trial Design, Endpoints, and Regulatory Pathways.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2026Review
- [Stroke mimic after wasp sting in a child with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy X type 1].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2026Article
- Functional disease progression in children with inherited peripheral neuropathies: A prospective cohort study.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Axonal-demyelinating differences in functional change in pediatric Charcot-Marie-Tooth and related neuropathies.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- AAVrh74.tMCK.NT-3 Surrogate Gene Therapy in a Mouse Model of CMT2A.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Pediatric Cohort of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: Clinical Features and Genetic Distribution.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related neuropathies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Next-generation sequencing for pediatric-onset neuromuscular disorders unresolved by conventional diagnostic methods.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Overlapping Spectrum of Hereditary Neuropathies: Clinical and Genetic Insights From the UAE.Cureus · 2025Article
- Designing and Implementing a Web-Based Platform for Accurate and Reliable Clinical Outcome Measures and Global Certification for Evaluating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Article
- Longitudinal assessment of natural disease progression in Brazilian children and adolescents with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Observational
- Long-term outcomes in children with riboflavin transporter deficiency and surveillance recommendations.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Hip Dysplasia in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: Insights From a Large Cohort of Children and Adolescents.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Article
- Pediatric Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Paediatric drugs · 2024Review
- Clinical and genetic features of patients suffering from CMT4J.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Gene Distribution in Pediatric-Onset Inherited Peripheral Neuropathy: A Single Tertiary Center in Thailand.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2024Article
- Neuropathy due to bi-allelic SH3TC2 variants: genotype-phenotype correlation and natural history.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Association of Body Mass Index With Disease Progression in Children With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.Neurology · 2023Article
- Trials for Slowly Progressive Neurogenetic Diseases Need Surrogate Endpoints.Annals of neurology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceDisease severity of childhood Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) has not been extensively characterized, either within or between types of CMT to date.
objectiveTo assess the variability of disease severity in a large cohort of children and adolescents with CMT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 520 children and adolescents aged 3 to 20 years at 8 universities and hospitals involved in the Inherited Neuropathies Consortium between August 6, 2009, and July 31, 2014, in Australia, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Data analysis was conducted from August 1, 2014, to December 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Scores on the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Pediatric Scale (CMTPedS), a well-validated unidimensional clinical outcome measure to assess disease severity. This instrument includes 11 items assessing fine and gross motor function, sensation, and balance to produce a total score ranging from 0 (unaffected) to 44 (severely affected).
resultsAmong the 520 participants (274 males) aged 3 to 20 years, CMT type 1A (CMT1A) was the most prevalent type (252 [48.5%]), followed by CMT2A (31 [6.0%]), CMT1B (15 [2.9%]), CMT4C (13 [2.5%]), and CMTX1 (10 [1.9%]). Disease severity ranged from 1 to 44 points on the CMTPedS (mean [SD], 21.5 [8.9]), with ankle dorsiflexion strength and functional hand dexterity test being most affected. Participants with CMT1B (mean [SD] CMTPedS score, 24.0 [7.4]), CMT2A (29.7 [7.1]), and CMT4C (29.8 [8.6]) were more severely affected than those with CMT1A (18.9 [7.7]) and CMTX1 (males: 15.3 [7.7]; females: 13.0 [3.6]) (P < .05). Scores on the CMTPedS tended to worsen principally during childhood (ages, 3-10 years) for participants with CMT4C and CMTX1 and predominantly during adolescence for those with CMT1B and CMT2A (ages, 11-20 years), while CMT1A worsened consistently throughout childhood and adolescence. For individual items, participants with CMT4C recorded more affected functional dexterity test scores than did those with all other types of CMT (P < .05). Participants with CMT1A and CMTX1 performed significantly better on the 9-hole peg test and balance test than did those with all other types of CMT (P < .05). Participants with CMT2A had the weakest grip strength (P < .05), while those with CMT2A and CMT4C exhibited the weakest ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion strength, as well as the lowest long jump and 6-minute walk test distances (P < .05). Multiple regression modeling identified increasing age (r = 0.356, β = 0.617, P < .001) height (r = 0.251, β = 0.309, P = .002), self-reported foot pain (r = 0.162, β = .114, P = .009), and self-reported hand weakness (r = 0.243, β = 0.203, P < .001) as independent predictors of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results highlight the phenotypic variability within CMT genotypes and mutation-specific manifestations between types. This study has identified distinct functional limitations and self-reported impairments to target in future therapeutic trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.