Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27043279›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016

Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis.

Connie Yang, Mark Chilvers, Mark Montgomery, Sarah J Nolan

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Human Recombinant DNase I (PulmozymeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Enzyme Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Approaches to Targeting Bacterial Biofilms in Cystic Fibrosis Airways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Changing Face of Cystic Fibrosis and Its Implications for Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. DNase to the Rescue! Clearing Mitochondrial DNA May Have NET Benefits in Lung Transplantation.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Surgical Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Cystic Fibrosis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Connie YangDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6H 3V4.
Mark Chilvers
Mark Montgomery
Sarah J Nolan
British Columbia Children's Hospital · CAAlberta Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDornase alfa is currently used as a mucolytic to treat pulmonary disease (the major cause of morbidity and mortality) in cystic fibrosis. It reduces mucus viscosity in the lungs, promoting improved clearance of secretions. This is an update of a previously published review.

objectivesTo determine whether the use of dornase alfa in cystic fibrosis is associated with improved mortality and morbidity compared to placebo or other medications that improve airway clearance, and to identify any adverse events associated with its use. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and abstracts from conferences. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Register: 30 November 2015.Clinicaltrials.gov was also searched to identify unpublished or ongoing trials. Date of most recent search: 28 November 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing dornase alfa to placebo, standard therapy or other medications that improve airway clearance. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Authors independently assessed trials against the inclusion criteria; two authors carried out analysis of methodological quality and data extraction. MAIN

resultsThe searches identified 54 trials, of which 19 (including a total of 2565 participants) met our inclusion criteria. Three additional papers examined the healthcare cost from one of the clinical trials. Fifteen trials compared dornase alfa to placebo or no dornase alfa treatment (2447 participants); two compared daily dornase to hypertonic saline (32 participants); one compared daily dornase alfa with hypertonic saline and alternate day dornase alfa (48 participants); one compared dornase alfa to mannitol and the combination of both drugs (38 participants). Trial duration varied from six days to three years.Compared to placebo, forced expiratory volume at one second improved in the intervention groups, with significant differences at one, three, six months and two years. There was also a significant improvement in lung clearance index at one month. There was a decrease in pulmonary exacerbations compared to placebo in trials of longer duration. The quality of the evidence from placebo-controlled trials was moderate to high for outcomes of lung function and pulmonary exacerbations. Limited, low quality evidence was available for changes in quality of life from baseline. One trial that examined the cost of care, including the cost of dornase alfa, found that the cost savings from dornase alfa offset 18% to 38% of the medication costs.The results for trials comparing dornase alfa to other medications that improve airway clearance (hypertonic saline or mannitol) were mixed, with one trial showing a greater improvement in forced expiratory volume at one second for dornase alfa compared to hypertonic saline, and three trials finding no difference between medications. In the only trial to assess the combination of dornase alfa with another medication compared to dornase alone, there was no benefit seen with the combination of dornase alfa and mannitol. Evidence of dornase alfa compared to other medications was limited and the open-label design of the trials may have induced bias, therefore the quality of the evidence was judged to be low.Dornase alfa did not cause significantly more adverse effects, except voice alteration and rash. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is evidence to show that, compared with placebo, therapy with dornase alfa improves lung function in people with cystic fibrosis in trials lasting one month to two years. There was a decrease in pulmonary exacerbations in trials of six months or longer. Voice alteration and rash appear to be the only adverse events reported with increased frequency in randomised controlled trials. There is not enough evidence to firmly conclude if dornase alfa is superior to hyperosmolar agents in improving lung function.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCystic FibrosisDeoxyribonuclease IExpectorantsHumansInfantMannitolRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsSaline Solution, HypertonicDeoxyribonuclease Idornase alfaExpectorantsMannitolRecombinant ProteinsSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID27043279
OpenAlexW2475052631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.